P-802. Assessing the Benefit of Adding a Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Platform for Bloodstream Infections to a Well-Established Stewardship Program within an Academic Health-system

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic tests for pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) have enhanced clinicians’ ability to promptly initiate appropriate antimicrobials and streamline regimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of adding the Accelerate Pheno® (AP) system for rapid AST to an existing blood culture identification multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) workflow in Gram negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs). Methods A multi-centered, retrospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted in patients hospitalized with aerobic GNBSIs between August 2022 and August 2024. Notable exclusions were patients with polymicrobial GNBSIs and those who were no longer hospitalized prior to initiation of antibiotic therapy or blood culture results. The primary endpoint of time to first appropriate streamlined therapy (FaST) was compared between an AP group and post-AP group during a 3-month period. Key secondary endpoints included time to first and final AST, time to de-escalation and notable discordances in AST. Results Among 355 charts reviewed, 228 patients were included in the analysis (125 in the AP group and 103 in the post-AP group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. A faster median time to initial susceptibilities was observed in the AP-group (39 h vs. 65.5 h, p< 0.0001). However, a median difference of 23.3 h to final susceptibilities was observed between the AP-group and the post-AP group (93.2 h vs. 69.9 h, p=0.008). A total of seven AST discordances were identified in the AP-group, four of which were major errors (false resistance). There was no significant difference in the median time to FaST (22.8 h vs. 11.6 h, p=0.2) or median time to de-escalation (41.9 h vs. 42 h, p =0.527). Conclusion The addition of the AP system did not appear to have a meaningful impact on time to FaST or time to de-escalation compared with a historical mPCR and antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) workflow, despite a more rapid availability of first AST. The study findings may be explained by local susceptibility rates and a well-established ASP that performs prospective audit and feedback on all positive blood cultures with early antibiotic optimization guided by prediction tools and mPCR results. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1011
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-802. Assessing the Benefit of Adding a Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Platform for Bloodstream Infections to a Well-Established Stewardship Program within an Academic Health-system

Chengwen Teng, Andrew B. Gainey, Cassandra Ferguson, Kayla Antosz et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

P-802. Assessing the Benefit of Adding a Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Platform for Bloodstream Infections to a Well-Established Stewardship Program within an Academic Health-system

Chengwen Teng, Andrew B. Gainey, Cassandra Ferguson, Kayla Antosz, Colter G. Sheveland, Caroline Jozefczyk, Sarah Al Mansi, P Brandon Bookstaver, Robert Daniels, Anna-Kathryn Burch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic tests for pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) have enhanced clinicians’ ability to promptly initiate appropriate antimicrobials and streamline regimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of adding the Accelerate Pheno® (AP) system for rapid AST to an existing blood culture identification multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) workflow in Gram negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs). Methods A multi-centered, retrospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted in patients hospitalized with aerobic GNBSIs between August 2022 and August 2024. Notable exclusions were patients with polymicrobial GNBSIs and those who were no longer hospitalized prior to initiation of antibiotic therapy or blood culture results. The primary endpoint of time to first appropriate streamlined therapy (FaST) was compared between an AP group and post-AP group during a 3-month period. Key secondary endpoints included time to first and final AST, time to de-escalation and notable discordances in AST. Results Among 355 charts reviewed, 228 patients were included in the analysis (125 in the AP group and 103 in the post-AP group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. A faster median time to initial susceptibilities was observed in the AP-group (39 h vs. 65.5 h, p< 0.0001). However, a median difference of 23.3 h to final susceptibilities was observed between the AP-group and the post-AP group (93.2 h vs. 69.9 h, p=0.008). A total of seven AST discordances were identified in the AP-group, four of which were major errors (false resistance). There was no significant difference in the median time to FaST (22.8 h vs. 11.6 h, p=0.2) or median time to de-escalation (41.9 h vs. 42 h, p =0.527). Conclusion The addition of the AP system did not appear to have a meaningful impact on time to FaST or time to de-escalation compared with a historical mPCR and antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) workflow, despite a more rapid availability of first AST. The study findings may be explained by local susceptibility rates and a well-established ASP that performs prospective audit and feedback on all positive blood cultures with early antibiotic optimization guided by prediction tools and mPCR results. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Seton Hall University (US), Prisma Health (US), University of South Carolina (US), Palmetto Health Richland (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.