563. Safety and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273.815 in COVID-19 Vaccine-Naïve Children 2 Through 4 Years of Age: Results From a Phase 3, Open-Label Trial

Abstract Background Due to infection and/or immunization, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rates in children aged 2-4 years have increased and are now comparable to those aged ≥5 years; these children may benefit from a single dose vaccine regimen currently recommended for those aged ≥5 years. Here, we present results from a phase 3 study evaluating the effectiveness of a single dose of an XBB.1.5-containing vaccine (mRNA-1273.815) in children aged 2-4 years. Methods An open-label trial (NCT05436834) evaluated safety and immunogenicity of monovalent mRNA-1273.815 in COVID-19 vaccine-naïve participants aged 2-4 years (Cohort A; single 25 µg dose). Effectiveness was inferred based on comparison of immune responses (measured by geometric mean concentrations of neutralizing antibodies against XBB.1. 5) in baseline SARS-CoV-2 positive (Pos) Cohort A participants (Per-protocol immunogenicity subset-Pos [PPIS-Pos]) to vaccine-naïve baseline SARS-CoV-2 negative (Neg) participants aged 6-23 months (Cohort B PPIS-Neg; 25 µg 2-dose series). Noninferiority (NI) of the single dose regimen was considered established if lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR: Day 29 Cohort A vs Day 57 Cohort B) was >0.667. Safety was assessed through 3 months after vaccination. Results A total of 199 participants (Cohort A) and 399 participants (Cohort B) received study vaccine; median ages were 3 years and 13 months, respectively (Table 1). Safety profile of mRNA-1273.815 in both cohorts was similar to the established safety profile of mRNA-1273 vaccines in the respective age groups and generally well-tolerated. In the primary immunogenicity analysis against XBB.1.5, the GMR of a single 25 µg dose of mRNA-1273.815 (Cohort A PPIS-Pos) compared to a 25 µg 2-dose series of mRNA-1273.815 (Cohort B PPIS-Neg) was 1.195 (95% CI, 0.800-1.784; Table 2), meeting the prespecified NI criterion. Conclusion No new safety concerns were identified in children aged 2-4 years and 6-23 months who received mRNA-1273.815. Success criteria for the primary immunogenicity endpoint were met, establishing the effectiveness of a single 25 µg dose. These data support lowering the age recommendation for a single dose of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines from ≥5 years to ≥2 years, regardless of prior immunization status. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.172
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

563. Safety and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273.815 in COVID-19 Vaccine-Naïve Children 2 Through 4 Years of Age: Results From a Phase 3, Open-Label Trial

Spyros Chalkias, Avika Dixit, Anne Yeakey, Frances Priddy et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

563. Safety and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273.815 in COVID-19 Vaccine-Naïve Children 2 Through 4 Years of Age: Results From a Phase 3, Open-Label Trial

Spyros Chalkias, Avika Dixit, Anne Yeakey, Frances Priddy, Rituparna Das, Bethany Biron Girard, Roozbeh Sharif, Wen Zhou, Greer Chambers, Wenqin Xu, Rosane Poston
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to infection and/or immunization, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rates in children aged 2-4 years have increased and are now comparable to those aged ≥5 years; these children may benefit from a single dose vaccine regimen currently recommended for those aged ≥5 years. Here, we present results from a phase 3 study evaluating the effectiveness of a single dose of an XBB.1.5-containing vaccine (mRNA-1273.815) in children aged 2-4 years. Methods An open-label trial (NCT05436834) evaluated safety and immunogenicity of monovalent mRNA-1273.815 in COVID-19 vaccine-naïve participants aged 2-4 years (Cohort A; single 25 µg dose). Effectiveness was inferred based on comparison of immune responses (measured by geometric mean concentrations of neutralizing antibodies against XBB.1. 5) in baseline SARS-CoV-2 positive (Pos) Cohort A participants (Per-protocol immunogenicity subset-Pos [PPIS-Pos]) to vaccine-naïve baseline SARS-CoV-2 negative (Neg) participants aged 6-23 months (Cohort B PPIS-Neg; 25 µg 2-dose series). Noninferiority (NI) of the single dose regimen was considered established if lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR: Day 29 Cohort A vs Day 57 Cohort B) was >0.667. Safety was assessed through 3 months after vaccination. Results A total of 199 participants (Cohort A) and 399 participants (Cohort B) received study vaccine; median ages were 3 years and 13 months, respectively (Table 1). Safety profile of mRNA-1273.815 in both cohorts was similar to the established safety profile of mRNA-1273 vaccines in the respective age groups and generally well-tolerated. In the primary immunogenicity analysis against XBB.1.5, the GMR of a single 25 µg dose of mRNA-1273.815 (Cohort A PPIS-Pos) compared to a 25 µg 2-dose series of mRNA-1273.815 (Cohort B PPIS-Neg) was 1.195 (95% CI, 0.800-1.784; Table 2), meeting the prespecified NI criterion. Conclusion No new safety concerns were identified in children aged 2-4 years and 6-23 months who received mRNA-1273.815. Success criteria for the primary immunogenicity endpoint were met, establishing the effectiveness of a single 25 µg dose. These data support lowering the age recommendation for a single dose of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines from ≥5 years to ≥2 years, regardless of prior immunization status. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US), Beaumont Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.