P-58. Evaluation of Treatment Failure in Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. Bacteremia Treated with AmpC vs. Non-AmpC Stable Antibiotics

Abstract Background The 2024 IDSA guidelines exclude Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia species as organisms at moderate-high risk of AmpC production. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes between patients who received non-AmpC stable (N-AMPC) vs. AmpC stable (AMPC) antibiotics in the treatment of bacteremia caused by these organisms. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study included adults (≥18 years) admitted between 8/1/2016 and 8/1/2024 with a newly identified monomicrobial bacteremia with either S. marcescens, M. morganii, or Providencia spp. which was susceptible to ceftriaxone. The primary outcome, treatment failure, was evaluated as a composite of: escalation of therapy within 30 days, persistent/recurrent infection with the same pathogen within 30 days, and transition to hospice or mortality during admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS). Results Of the 299 patients included in the primary analysis, 115 and 184 were in the N-AMPC and AMPC group, respectively. S. marcescens was the most common organism identified (75/115 (65%) vs 146/184 (78%)) and urinary tract infection was the most common cause of bacteremia (49/115 (43%) vs 43/184 (23%)) in the N-AMPC and AMPC groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for more females and higher median age in the AMPC group. A higher rate of treatment failure was observed in the AMPC group (11/115 (9.6%) vs 36/184 (19.6%), p=0.0208, OR 2.3 (1.13 to 4.78)). 20/115 (23%) and 61/185 (33%) of patients in the N-AMPC and AMPC group required ICU admission, respectively (p=0.0138). Median hospital LOS was 7.50 [1.04-163] days in the N-AMPC and 7.49 [0.17-690.68] days in the AMPC group (p=0.219). Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis showed ICU admission was significantly associated with treatment failure (p=0.0003, OR 0.299 (0.15 to 0.57)). Conclusion Treatment failure was significantly higher in the AMPC group. This may be explained by higher acuity, as ICU admission was found to be an independent predictor of treatment failure. This analysis supports the use of N-AMPC stable regimens in low-risk patients with bacteremia caused by S. marcescens, M. morganii, and Providencia spp. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.287
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-58. Evaluation of Treatment Failure in Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. Bacteremia Treated with AmpC vs. Non-AmpC Stable Antibiotics

Anastasia Bilinskaya, Lavanya Jitendranath, Rosanna Li, K. W. Linder et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-58. Evaluation of Treatment Failure in Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. Bacteremia Treated with AmpC vs. Non-AmpC Stable Antibiotics

Anastasia Bilinskaya, Lavanya Jitendranath, Rosanna Li, K. W. Linder, Saipriya Gadiraju, Tyler Ackley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The 2024 IDSA guidelines exclude Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia species as organisms at moderate-high risk of AmpC production. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes between patients who received non-AmpC stable (N-AMPC) vs. AmpC stable (AMPC) antibiotics in the treatment of bacteremia caused by these organisms. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study included adults (≥18 years) admitted between 8/1/2016 and 8/1/2024 with a newly identified monomicrobial bacteremia with either S. marcescens, M. morganii, or Providencia spp. which was susceptible to ceftriaxone. The primary outcome, treatment failure, was evaluated as a composite of: escalation of therapy within 30 days, persistent/recurrent infection with the same pathogen within 30 days, and transition to hospice or mortality during admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS). Results Of the 299 patients included in the primary analysis, 115 and 184 were in the N-AMPC and AMPC group, respectively. S. marcescens was the most common organism identified (75/115 (65%) vs 146/184 (78%)) and urinary tract infection was the most common cause of bacteremia (49/115 (43%) vs 43/184 (23%)) in the N-AMPC and AMPC groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for more females and higher median age in the AMPC group. A higher rate of treatment failure was observed in the AMPC group (11/115 (9.6%) vs 36/184 (19.6%), p=0.0208, OR 2.3 (1.13 to 4.78)). 20/115 (23%) and 61/185 (33%) of patients in the N-AMPC and AMPC group required ICU admission, respectively (p=0.0138). Median hospital LOS was 7.50 [1.04-163] days in the N-AMPC and 7.49 [0.17-690.68] days in the AMPC group (p=0.219). Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis showed ICU admission was significantly associated with treatment failure (p=0.0003, OR 0.299 (0.15 to 0.57)). Conclusion Treatment failure was significantly higher in the AMPC group. This may be explained by higher acuity, as ICU admission was found to be an independent predictor of treatment failure. This analysis supports the use of N-AMPC stable regimens in low-risk patients with bacteremia caused by S. marcescens, M. morganii, and Providencia spp. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Hartford Hospital (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.