P-743. Assessing Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (doxy PEP) Engagement in Care at a Midwestern HIV/PrEP Clinic

Abstract Background Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has demonstrated sustained effectiveness in multiple real-world settings. However, data on adherence to guideline-directed follow-up for patients receiving doxy PEP remain limited. This study evaluated adherence to guideline-directed sexually transmitted infection (STI) screenings and patterns of patient engagement at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Specialty Care Clinic, HIV/PrEP Programs (UNMC SCC). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of patients who received doxy PEP from UNMC SCC over an 18-month period (June 1, 2023-November 30, 2024). Patients receiving doxycycline for other indications were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with missed STI screenings, defined as fewer than 4 screenings in 12 months, per CDC doxy PEP guidelines. Secondary outcomes included number of missed STI screenings, guideline directed STI and HIV screenings, STI diagnoses while prescribed doxy PEP, proportion of days covered (total number of pills prescribed/number of days in study period), and changes in doxy PEP prescription quantity. Descriptive statistics summarized cohort characteristics and outcomes. Chi-square tests assessed associations of select outcomes between people with HIV vs people on HIV PrEP. Results Characteristics of the cohort and prescriptions are listed in Table 1. Primary and secondary outcomes are reported in Tables 2 and 3. Of the 186 patients included in the study, 56% had at least one missed STI screening with a median of 1 (range 0,5) missed STI screening. There was no significant difference in missed STI screenings between care groups (people with HIV vs people on HIV PrEP). A total of 27 (15%) patients were diagnosed with an STI while on doxy PEP, with gonorrhea being the most common (59%). Of those, 17 (16%) were in patients with at least 1 missed STI visit vs 10 (12%) in patients with no missed STI visits (p=0.425). Conclusion Engaging patients on doxy PEP in guideline-recommended STI screenings is challenging. Most patients had at least 1 missed STI screening. As utilization of doxy PEP expands, it is necessary to ensure appropriate follow-up and continued engagement in care through routine STI screenings. Disclosures Josh Havens, PharmD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant Jennifer M. Davis, MD, Viiv: Grant/Research Support Kimberly Scarsi, PharmD, Merck & Co: Grant/Research Support|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.954
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-743. Assessing Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (doxy PEP) Engagement in Care at a Midwestern HIV/PrEP Clinic

Kimberly K. Scarsi, Josh Havens, Jennifer M Davis, Shawnalyn W Sunagawa et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

P-743. Assessing Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (doxy PEP) Engagement in Care at a Midwestern HIV/PrEP Clinic

Kimberly K. Scarsi, Josh Havens, Jennifer M Davis, Shawnalyn W Sunagawa, Vanessa L Lo, Sara H Bares
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has demonstrated sustained effectiveness in multiple real-world settings. However, data on adherence to guideline-directed follow-up for patients receiving doxy PEP remain limited. This study evaluated adherence to guideline-directed sexually transmitted infection (STI) screenings and patterns of patient engagement at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Specialty Care Clinic, HIV/PrEP Programs (UNMC SCC). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of patients who received doxy PEP from UNMC SCC over an 18-month period (June 1, 2023-November 30, 2024). Patients receiving doxycycline for other indications were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with missed STI screenings, defined as fewer than 4 screenings in 12 months, per CDC doxy PEP guidelines. Secondary outcomes included number of missed STI screenings, guideline directed STI and HIV screenings, STI diagnoses while prescribed doxy PEP, proportion of days covered (total number of pills prescribed/number of days in study period), and changes in doxy PEP prescription quantity. Descriptive statistics summarized cohort characteristics and outcomes. Chi-square tests assessed associations of select outcomes between people with HIV vs people on HIV PrEP. Results Characteristics of the cohort and prescriptions are listed in Table 1. Primary and secondary outcomes are reported in Tables 2 and 3. Of the 186 patients included in the study, 56% had at least one missed STI screening with a median of 1 (range 0,5) missed STI screening. There was no significant difference in missed STI screenings between care groups (people with HIV vs people on HIV PrEP). A total of 27 (15%) patients were diagnosed with an STI while on doxy PEP, with gonorrhea being the most common (59%). Of those, 17 (16%) were in patients with at least 1 missed STI visit vs 10 (12%) in patients with no missed STI visits (p=0.425). Conclusion Engaging patients on doxy PEP in guideline-recommended STI screenings is challenging. Most patients had at least 1 missed STI screening. As utilization of doxy PEP expands, it is necessary to ensure appropriate follow-up and continued engagement in care through routine STI screenings. Disclosures Josh Havens, PharmD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant Jennifer M. Davis, MD, Viiv: Grant/Research Support Kimberly Scarsi, PharmD, Merck & Co: Grant/Research Support|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.