P-1389. Predictors for False Positive Interferon Gamma Release Assays in the San Antonio Market of the Military Health System

Abstract Background Identification of patients with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high-risk populations is critical in global efforts to eradicate tuberculosis. However, false positive rates with interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) can be high when screening low-risk populations. Factors associated with false-positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) testing have not been described in the United States military. Methods All patients with a positive QFT-Plus assay between January 2022 and June 2024 at Joint Base San Antonio were included for further analysis. Patients were deemed to have true infection (either active or latent disease) or a false positive QFT-Plus test based on determination by the treatment team. Demographic and clinical information was compared between true positive and false positive groups using the Fisher’s exact test for nominal variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results A total of 192 patients were included with 99 (52%) true positive results, 12 (6%) false positive, 60 (31%) previously treated patients, and 21 (11%) with incomplete follow-up (Table 1). Most patients who tested positive were serving in the military (53%) and the most common indication for testing was occupational screening. Twenty-three (23%) patients with true positives had no risk factors for tuberculosis. Comparing those with latent or active tuberculosis to those with a false positive test, there were no significant differences by demographics, risk factors, ordering location, or indication for testing (Table 2). However, the TB – nil was significantly greater in true positive patients (0.968 [0.52-3.52] vs. 0.435 [0.38-0.62], p = 0.00072). Conclusion Despite the need for targeting high-risk populations, most IGRAs in this large military market are ordered to screen low risk patients. There was no difference in demographic or clinical risk factors between those with true positives and false positives, but there were quantitative differences in the results of the IGRA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1576
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1389. Predictors for False Positive Interferon Gamma Release Assays in the San Antonio Market of the Military Health System

Diane C. Homeyer, John Kim, Joseph Marcus
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

P-1389. Predictors for False Positive Interferon Gamma Release Assays in the San Antonio Market of the Military Health System

Diane C. Homeyer, John Kim, Joseph Marcus
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Identification of patients with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high-risk populations is critical in global efforts to eradicate tuberculosis. However, false positive rates with interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) can be high when screening low-risk populations. Factors associated with false-positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) testing have not been described in the United States military. Methods All patients with a positive QFT-Plus assay between January 2022 and June 2024 at Joint Base San Antonio were included for further analysis. Patients were deemed to have true infection (either active or latent disease) or a false positive QFT-Plus test based on determination by the treatment team. Demographic and clinical information was compared between true positive and false positive groups using the Fisher’s exact test for nominal variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results A total of 192 patients were included with 99 (52%) true positive results, 12 (6%) false positive, 60 (31%) previously treated patients, and 21 (11%) with incomplete follow-up (Table 1). Most patients who tested positive were serving in the military (53%) and the most common indication for testing was occupational screening. Twenty-three (23%) patients with true positives had no risk factors for tuberculosis. Comparing those with latent or active tuberculosis to those with a false positive test, there were no significant differences by demographics, risk factors, ordering location, or indication for testing (Table 2). However, the TB – nil was significantly greater in true positive patients (0.968 [0.52-3.52] vs. 0.435 [0.38-0.62], p = 0.00072). Conclusion Despite the need for targeting high-risk populations, most IGRAs in this large military market are ordered to screen low risk patients. There was no difference in demographic or clinical risk factors between those with true positives and false positives, but there were quantitative differences in the results of the IGRA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(Supplement_1)
Brooke Army Medical Center (US), Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.