Characterizations of inexact proximal operators

Proximal operators are now ubiquitous in non-smooth optimization. Since their introduction in the seminal work of Moreau, many papers have shown their effectiveness on a wide variety of problems, culminating in their use to construct convergent deep learning methods. The characterization of these operators for non-convex penalties was completed recently in [Gribonval et al, A characterization of proximity operators, 2020]. In this paper, we propose to follow this line of work by characterizing inexact proximal operators, thus providing an answer to what constitutes a good approximation of these operators.We propose several definitions of approximations and discuss their regularity, approximation power, and their fixed points.Equipped with these characterizations, we investigate the convergence of proximal algorithms in the presence of errors that may be non-summable and/or non-vanishing. In particular, we look at the proximal point algorithm, and at the forward-backward, Peaceman-Rachford and Douglas-Rachford algorithms when we minimize the sum of a weakly convex function (whose proximal operator is approximated) and a strongly convex function.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Optimization and Variational Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizations of inexact proximal operators

Samuel Vaiter, Guillaume Lauga
Open MIND
Optimization and Variational Analysis
article

Characterizations of inexact proximal operators

Samuel Vaiter, Guillaume Lauga
article en

Abstract

Proximal operators are now ubiquitous in non-smooth optimization. Since their introduction in the seminal work of Moreau, many papers have shown their effectiveness on a wide variety of problems, culminating in their use to construct convergent deep learning methods. The characterization of these operators for non-convex penalties was completed recently in [Gribonval et al, A characterization of proximity operators, 2020]. In this paper, we propose to follow this line of work by characterizing inexact proximal operators, thus providing an answer to what constitutes a good approximation of these operators.We propose several definitions of approximations and discuss their regularity, approximation power, and their fixed points.Equipped with these characterizations, we investigate the convergence of proximal algorithms in the presence of errors that may be non-summable and/or non-vanishing. In particular, we look at the proximal point algorithm, and at the forward-backward, Peaceman-Rachford and Douglas-Rachford algorithms when we minimize the sum of a weakly convex function (whose proximal operator is approximated) and a strongly convex function.

Open MIND
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Optimization and Variational Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Characterizations of inexact proximal operators — Samuel Vaiter, Guillaume Lauga · Open MIND (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS