GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly relevant in higher education, faculty face growing pressure to integrate it ethically and effectively into teaching. While students are already using GenAI and seek faculty guidance, course materials often lack clear policies or instructional support. This study surveyed faculty and analyzed syllabi at a large public Midwestern research university to examine how GenAI is addressed in instruction. Findings reveal that faculty generally view GenAI as a potentially useful learning tool but report limited institutional guidance and inconsistent classroom practices. Despite some departmental efforts to establish GenAI policies, consensus on best practices is lacking. These results underscore the need for clearer institutional frameworks and faculty development to support ethical, pedagogically sound use of GenAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions

Krista Longtin, André C. Buchenot, Kevin M. Jones, Ryan Brewer et al.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions

Krista Longtin, André C. Buchenot, Kevin M. Jones, Ryan Brewer, Lamia Scherzinger, Fawzi BenMessaoud
article en

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly relevant in higher education, faculty face growing pressure to integrate it ethically and effectively into teaching. While students are already using GenAI and seek faculty guidance, course materials often lack clear policies or instructional support. This study surveyed faculty and analyzed syllabi at a large public Midwestern research university to examine how GenAI is addressed in instruction. Findings reveal that faculty generally view GenAI as a potentially useful learning tool but report limited institutional guidance and inconsistent classroom practices. Despite some departmental efforts to establish GenAI policies, consensus on best practices is lacking. These results underscore the need for clearer institutional frameworks and faculty development to support ethical, pedagogically sound use of GenAI.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions — Krista Longtin, André C. Buchenot, et al. · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS