From Tool to Method: Developing AI Literacy in an Upper-Level History Course

Faculty and students alike face growing uncertainty about the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the college classroom, particularly in writing-intensive and discussion-based disciplines such as history. This qualitative case study explored how undergraduate students in a history course responded to the structured introduction of AI tools throughout a semester-long writing sequence. The course was designed in three modules: traditional writing without AI, guided experimentation with AI support, and student-directed use of AI during a final comparative writing project. Student responses were collected through surveys and written reflections across each module, as well as a final exit survey. Findings indicate that students developed increasingly nuanced understandings of AI’s role in academic work, shifting from early skepticism or (over)reliance to thoughtful, task-specific engagement. While students continued to express distrust in AI as a grading tool, many acknowledged its value in brainstorming, organization, and revision. The study offers insight into the evolving relationship between students and classroom technology and suggests the importance of instructor framing, peer discussion, and ethical reflection in building meaningful AI literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Tool to Method: Developing AI Literacy in an Upper-Level History Course

Trini Stickle, Marko Dumančić
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

From Tool to Method: Developing AI Literacy in an Upper-Level History Course

Trini Stickle, Marko Dumančić
article en

Abstract

Faculty and students alike face growing uncertainty about the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the college classroom, particularly in writing-intensive and discussion-based disciplines such as history. This qualitative case study explored how undergraduate students in a history course responded to the structured introduction of AI tools throughout a semester-long writing sequence. The course was designed in three modules: traditional writing without AI, guided experimentation with AI support, and student-directed use of AI during a final comparative writing project. Student responses were collected through surveys and written reflections across each module, as well as a final exit survey. Findings indicate that students developed increasingly nuanced understandings of AI’s role in academic work, shifting from early skepticism or (over)reliance to thoughtful, task-specific engagement. While students continued to express distrust in AI as a grading tool, many acknowledged its value in brainstorming, organization, and revision. The study offers insight into the evolving relationship between students and classroom technology and suggests the importance of instructor framing, peer discussion, and ethical reflection in building meaningful AI literacy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Miami University (US), Western Kentucky University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.