Clinician continuity during pregnancy care: A mixed methods study

Abstract Objective To measure clinician continuity during pregnancy care and contextualize the findings with patient experiences of clinician continuity and their influence on trust‐building. Methods We conducted a convergent mixed methods study that examined the number of clinicians seen for all patients who gave birth at a large academic medical center between June 2023 and May 2024. Statistical analyses were performed across demographic subgroups with number of clinicians seen during pregnancy care as the primary outcome and the proportion of visits with the most frequently seen clinician as the secondary outcome. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to control for covariates. Purposive sampling was used to select a subset of English‐ and Spanish‐speaking patients for semi‐structured interviews. Participants completed a short sociodemographic survey and interviews exploring perceptions of clinical continuity, factors that build or erode trust, and patients’ recommendations for pregnancy care. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. Two researchers met to iteratively refine the codebook, discuss discrepancies, and reach consensus. Results We identified 2395 patients with eligible visits for the retrospective cohort. Total visits ranged from two to 38 (median 13, interquartile range [IQR] 10–15) with a median of 4 clinicians seen during pregnancy (IQR 3–5). Participants in the resident practice and hospital‐based maternal–fetal medicine practice saw more clinicians (7, IQR 6–9 and 5, IQR 3–7, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, 21.0% of patients had one or more visit with the obstetrician who was present at delivery. The qualitative phase included 14 participants with a median age of 31 years (IQR 28–35). Most participants valued continuity of care; discontinuity of care was a driving factor of patient–clinician trust erosion. Participants recommended clinical continuity as a strategy to improve pregnancy care. Conclusion Clinician continuity during outpatient pregnancy care varied by clinician type, practice, clinical site, and patient factors. Participants highly valued continuity of care, which was associated with greater trust and improved care experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70227
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician continuity during pregnancy care: A mixed methods study

Stephanie Li, Rose L. Molina, Michele R. Hacker, Sara Booth et al.
Pregnancy
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Clinician continuity during pregnancy care: A mixed methods study

Stephanie Li, Rose L. Molina, Michele R. Hacker, Sara Booth, Jeanne‐Marie Guise, Ryan M Gould, Daniela Reyes, Sarah Little, Ashley L. O'Donoghue, Anjali J. Kaimal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To measure clinician continuity during pregnancy care and contextualize the findings with patient experiences of clinician continuity and their influence on trust‐building. Methods We conducted a convergent mixed methods study that examined the number of clinicians seen for all patients who gave birth at a large academic medical center between June 2023 and May 2024. Statistical analyses were performed across demographic subgroups with number of clinicians seen during pregnancy care as the primary outcome and the proportion of visits with the most frequently seen clinician as the secondary outcome. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to control for covariates. Purposive sampling was used to select a subset of English‐ and Spanish‐speaking patients for semi‐structured interviews. Participants completed a short sociodemographic survey and interviews exploring perceptions of clinical continuity, factors that build or erode trust, and patients’ recommendations for pregnancy care. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. Two researchers met to iteratively refine the codebook, discuss discrepancies, and reach consensus. Results We identified 2395 patients with eligible visits for the retrospective cohort. Total visits ranged from two to 38 (median 13, interquartile range [IQR] 10–15) with a median of 4 clinicians seen during pregnancy (IQR 3–5). Participants in the resident practice and hospital‐based maternal–fetal medicine practice saw more clinicians (7, IQR 6–9 and 5, IQR 3–7, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, 21.0% of patients had one or more visit with the obstetrician who was present at delivery. The qualitative phase included 14 participants with a median age of 31 years (IQR 28–35). Most participants valued continuity of care; discontinuity of care was a driving factor of patient–clinician trust erosion. Participants recommended clinical continuity as a strategy to improve pregnancy care. Conclusion Clinician continuity during outpatient pregnancy care varied by clinician type, practice, clinical site, and patient factors. Participants highly valued continuity of care, which was associated with greater trust and improved care experiences.

PregnancyVol. 2(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of South Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.