Evaluating the capability of large language models in radiotherapy through professional certification examinations in Japan

Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Grok, have rapidly advanced in natural language understanding and are increasingly being applied to specialized fields, including medicine. In this study, we evaluated the domain-specific knowledge of LLMs in radiotherapy by assessing their performance on three certification examinations in Japan: the Japanese Medical Physicist Examination, the Japanese Board Examination for Radiologists and the Japanese Board Examination for Radiation Oncologists. We assessed five LLMs-ChatGPT-5, ChatGPT-5 Pro, Grok 4, Grok 4 heavy and Gemini 2.5 Pro-by inputting all multiple-choice questions from these exams into each model and recording their responses. The AI-generated answers were compared with reference answers determined by experienced medical physicists and radiation oncologists. The results demonstrated average accuracies of 84.7 ± 2.0% (ChatGPT-5), 94.7 ± 2.1% (ChatGPT-5 Pro), 78.4 ± 1.2% (Grok 4), 81.6 ± 2.2% (Grok 4 heavy) and 88.9 ± 1.2% (Gemini 2.5 Pro). All models achieved over 75% accuracy, with ChatGPT-5 Pro consistently outperforming others, attaining an average accuracy exceeding 90% across all examinations. These findings highlight the strong potential of advanced LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-5 Pro, for future integration into radiotherapy-related applications such as automated contouring and treatment planning support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf083
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the capability of large language models in radiotherapy through professional certification examinations in Japan

Keiichi Jingu, So Omata, Rei Umezawa, Hikaru TANNO et al.
Journal of Radiation Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the capability of large language models in radiotherapy through professional certification examinations in Japan

Keiichi Jingu, So Omata, Rei Umezawa, Hikaru TANNO, Yoshiyuki Katsuta, Seiya Koga, Ken Takeda, Hinako Harada, Shohei Tanaka, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takaya Yamamoto, K. Arai, Yoshiyuki Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Grok, have rapidly advanced in natural language understanding and are increasingly being applied to specialized fields, including medicine. In this study, we evaluated the domain-specific knowledge of LLMs in radiotherapy by assessing their performance on three certification examinations in Japan: the Japanese Medical Physicist Examination, the Japanese Board Examination for Radiologists and the Japanese Board Examination for Radiation Oncologists. We assessed five LLMs-ChatGPT-5, ChatGPT-5 Pro, Grok 4, Grok 4 heavy and Gemini 2.5 Pro-by inputting all multiple-choice questions from these exams into each model and recording their responses. The AI-generated answers were compared with reference answers determined by experienced medical physicists and radiation oncologists. The results demonstrated average accuracies of 84.7 ± 2.0% (ChatGPT-5), 94.7 ± 2.1% (ChatGPT-5 Pro), 78.4 ± 1.2% (Grok 4), 81.6 ± 2.2% (Grok 4 heavy) and 88.9 ± 1.2% (Gemini 2.5 Pro). All models achieved over 75% accuracy, with ChatGPT-5 Pro consistently outperforming others, attaining an average accuracy exceeding 90% across all examinations. These findings highlight the strong potential of advanced LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-5 Pro, for future integration into radiotherapy-related applications such as automated contouring and treatment planning support.

Journal of Radiation ResearchVol. 67(1)
Tohoku University (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.