Distinct risk factors drive white matter hyperintensity progression which relates to cognitive performance in individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease

Abstract Background White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a hallmark of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) linked to cognitive impairment and risk of dementia. Several risk factors are associated with WMH, but their contribution to WMH progression remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors driving WMHs changes in middle‐aged individuals and to examine their impact on cognitive decline. Method Global WMHs and cognitive composites were evaluated at baseline and after three years on 75 cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) whose WMH volumes increased (Progressors: ΔWMHv2‐v1 > 10+Percentile ΔWMHv2‐v1=0). CSF biomarkers, exposure to air pollutants, AD pathway‐specific polygenic risk scores (PRS) and cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated as predictors of the annual rate of change of global WMH, which was assessed as a predictor of cognitive performance. Partial least squares regression identified latent factors describing predictor‐outcome covariance. Latent factors and WMH change were used in independent linear regression models to predict cognitive performance. Result Global WMHs increased by 9.5%, while cognitive composites declined annually by 1–11% [Table 1]. Five latent factors explained 56% of the variance in risk factors, though their stability was limited, with only a few significant loadings after bootstrapping (CI 95%) [Figure 1A]. Key predictors of WMH progression included higher genetic risks for WMH and AD (via the stimulus signaling pathway) and notably lower educational attainment, even when paired with low levels of other risk factors [Figure 1B]. Component 3, linked to baseline risk factors (e.g. Centiloid, CSF Aβ42/40)[Figure 1C], predicted lower language and PACC scores after 3 years [Figure 2A]. While WMH change did not mediate this association, it correlated with worse PACC ( p = 0.057) and memory performance (ꞵ= ‐0.1 [‐0.188, ‐0.011], p = 0.028) [Figure 2B]. Conclusion WMHs progression is linked to subclinical cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals, for which low educational attainment and risk of AD via signaling pathways drive WMH progression. Remarkably, when combined with other risk factors, these variables predict worse PACC outcomes. These findings highlight the need to work with larger sample sizes to identify covariance patterns in modifiable and non‐modifiable risk factors related to cerebrovascular damage and cognitive decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106766
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct risk factors drive white matter hyperintensity progression which relates to cognitive performance in individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease

M. Cirach, Carole H. Sudre, Arcadi Segura i Navarro, Mahnaz Shekari et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Distinct risk factors drive white matter hyperintensity progression which relates to cognitive performance in individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease

M. Cirach, Carole H. Sudre, Arcadi Segura i Navarro, Mahnaz Shekari, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides, Clara Quijano Rubio, Natalia Vilor‐Tejedor, Juan Domingo Gispert, Marc Suárez‐Calvet, Patricia Genius, Blanca Rodríguez‐Fernández, Gwendlyn Kollmorgen, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a hallmark of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) linked to cognitive impairment and risk of dementia. Several risk factors are associated with WMH, but their contribution to WMH progression remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors driving WMHs changes in middle‐aged individuals and to examine their impact on cognitive decline. Method Global WMHs and cognitive composites were evaluated at baseline and after three years on 75 cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) whose WMH volumes increased (Progressors: ΔWMHv2‐v1 > 10+Percentile ΔWMHv2‐v1=0). CSF biomarkers, exposure to air pollutants, AD pathway‐specific polygenic risk scores (PRS) and cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated as predictors of the annual rate of change of global WMH, which was assessed as a predictor of cognitive performance. Partial least squares regression identified latent factors describing predictor‐outcome covariance. Latent factors and WMH change were used in independent linear regression models to predict cognitive performance. Result Global WMHs increased by 9.5%, while cognitive composites declined annually by 1–11% [Table 1]. Five latent factors explained 56% of the variance in risk factors, though their stability was limited, with only a few significant loadings after bootstrapping (CI 95%) [Figure 1A]. Key predictors of WMH progression included higher genetic risks for WMH and AD (via the stimulus signaling pathway) and notably lower educational attainment, even when paired with low levels of other risk factors [Figure 1B]. Component 3, linked to baseline risk factors (e.g. Centiloid, CSF Aβ42/40)[Figure 1C], predicted lower language and PACC scores after 3 years [Figure 2A]. While WMH change did not mediate this association, it correlated with worse PACC ( p = 0.057) and memory performance (ꞵ= ‐0.1 [‐0.188, ‐0.011], p = 0.028) [Figure 2B]. Conclusion WMHs progression is linked to subclinical cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals, for which low educational attainment and risk of AD via signaling pathways drive WMH progression. Remarkably, when combined with other risk factors, these variables predict worse PACC outcomes. These findings highlight the need to work with larger sample sizes to identify covariance patterns in modifiable and non‐modifiable risk factors related to cerebrovascular damage and cognitive decline.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (ES), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), King's College London (GB), Hawassa University (ET), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Roche Pharma AG (Germany) (DE), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (GB), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), AstraZeneca (Spain) (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.