Geography in Applied Research in the Industrial Development of Siberia

An assessment of the scientific heritage of V.A. Krotov, an outstanding Siberian geographer and economist who participated in the development of plans for the industrial development of Siberia based on territorial production complexes (TPCs), is presented from a modern perspective. Under the conditions of socialism, he sought opportunities to increase the economic and social efficiency of the functioning of complexes through the spatial factor. His works were of an applied nature and were based on the specific characteristics of the developed territory, using external experience in planning and managing production complexes. With the existing system of sectoral planning, he attempted to form a system of territorial management of a complex of production facilities based on economic zoning, where the basis for the allocation of regions should be internal interindustry connections. For these purposes, he proposed the allocation of special zones of the territorial production complex within the system of administrative-territorial division. In the system of economic zoning of the country’s territory, he insisted on the allocation of Eastern Siberia, and within it, the Angara–Yenisei economic subregion, in which Irkutsk oblast was united with Krasnoyarsk krai, and not with Transbaikalia. This point of view was subsequently confirmed by the 2018 Strategy for Spatial Development of the Russian Federation, abolishing the Baikal region, which had previously been formed for strategic planning purposes. From foreign experience, he was interested in theories of polarized development and institutional forms of interregional interaction, as an example of which he cited the work of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which managed a complex of production facilities in various industries across several states. It was noted that the topic of interregional cooperation in Russia was subsequently embodied in the form of interregional associations that coordinated the development of production links and product markets within their economic regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and Natural Resources
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1875372825700490
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geography in Applied Research in the Industrial Development of Siberia

N. M. Sysoeva
Geography and Natural Resources
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
article

Geography in Applied Research in the Industrial Development of Siberia

N. M. Sysoeva
article en

Abstract

An assessment of the scientific heritage of V.A. Krotov, an outstanding Siberian geographer and economist who participated in the development of plans for the industrial development of Siberia based on territorial production complexes (TPCs), is presented from a modern perspective. Under the conditions of socialism, he sought opportunities to increase the economic and social efficiency of the functioning of complexes through the spatial factor. His works were of an applied nature and were based on the specific characteristics of the developed territory, using external experience in planning and managing production complexes. With the existing system of sectoral planning, he attempted to form a system of territorial management of a complex of production facilities based on economic zoning, where the basis for the allocation of regions should be internal interindustry connections. For these purposes, he proposed the allocation of special zones of the territorial production complex within the system of administrative-territorial division. In the system of economic zoning of the country’s territory, he insisted on the allocation of Eastern Siberia, and within it, the Angara–Yenisei economic subregion, in which Irkutsk oblast was united with Krasnoyarsk krai, and not with Transbaikalia. This point of view was subsequently confirmed by the 2018 Strategy for Spatial Development of the Russian Federation, abolishing the Baikal region, which had previously been formed for strategic planning purposes. From foreign experience, he was interested in theories of polarized development and institutional forms of interregional interaction, as an example of which he cited the work of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which managed a complex of production facilities in various industries across several states. It was noted that the topic of interregional cooperation in Russia was subsequently embodied in the form of interregional associations that coordinated the development of production links and product markets within their economic regions.

Geography and Natural ResourcesVol. 46(S1)
V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.