Age- and sex-adjusted performance of a colorectal cancer screening test using US census distribution

The performance of a CRC screening blood test was validated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (PREEMPT CRC). The composition of the clinical study population can impact performance measures, potentially affecting the generalizability of the observed outcomes. We conducted a prespecified post-stratification adjustment analysis in which PREEMPT CRC performance values were adjusted to US Census age and sex distribution. The PREEMPT CRC evaluable cohort had a higher proportion of younger individuals and females than the census population. Compared to observed values, census adjustment demonstrated nominally higher CRC sensitivity (81.1% [95% confidence interval or CI, 71.3-88.1%] vs 79.2% [95% CI, 68.4-86.9%]) and advanced precancerous lesion sensitivity (13.7% [95% CI, 12.4-15.0%] vs 12.5% [95% CI, 11.3-13.8%]), with lower advanced colorectal neoplasia specificity (90.4% [95% CI, 90.0-90.7%) vs 91.5% [95% CI, 91.2-91.9%]). Negative and positive predictive values were consistent across age groups, highlighting consistent clinical interpretability of test results regardless of patient age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age- and sex-adjusted performance of a colorectal cancer screening test using US census distribution

Lilian C. Lee, David K. Edwards, Meng Zhen, Theodore R. Levin et al.
1 citations
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
24.20
article

Age- and sex-adjusted performance of a colorectal cancer screening test using US census distribution

Lilian C. Lee, David K. Edwards, Meng Zhen, Theodore R. Levin, Karolina Kutnik, Chung-Kai Sun, Andy Piscitello, Aasma Shaukat, Cosmin Deciu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The performance of a CRC screening blood test was validated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (PREEMPT CRC). The composition of the clinical study population can impact performance measures, potentially affecting the generalizability of the observed outcomes. We conducted a prespecified post-stratification adjustment analysis in which PREEMPT CRC performance values were adjusted to US Census age and sex distribution. The PREEMPT CRC evaluable cohort had a higher proportion of younger individuals and females than the census population. Compared to observed values, census adjustment demonstrated nominally higher CRC sensitivity (81.1% [95% confidence interval or CI, 71.3-88.1%] vs 79.2% [95% CI, 68.4-86.9%]) and advanced precancerous lesion sensitivity (13.7% [95% CI, 12.4-15.0%] vs 12.5% [95% CI, 11.3-13.8%]), with lower advanced colorectal neoplasia specificity (90.4% [95% CI, 90.0-90.7%) vs 91.5% [95% CI, 91.2-91.9%]). Negative and positive predictive values were consistent across age groups, highlighting consistent clinical interpretability of test results regardless of patient age.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Kaiser Permanente (US), Freenome (United States) (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.