Multiplex Biomarker Detection in Dried Plasma Spots: finding the best biomarker for remote blood collection

Abstract Background Conventional blood sampling for the testing of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers depends on stringent, time‐sensitive, and temperature‐dependent protocols for processing, shipping, and storage. Dry plasma spots (DPS) present a simpler, more scalable alternative for the collection, storage, and transport of blood samples and may offer an alternative sampling when access to blood volume is limited. Notably, neurodegenerative biomarkers such as p ‐tau, NfL, and GFAP from DPS have demonstrated a strong correlation with paired plasma on other platforms. In this pilot study, we aimed to expand on these findings by exploring a broader panel of central nervous system (CNS) biomarkers using DPS, assessing their potential for reliable and accurate detection. Method We used the NULISA™ platform to test multiplex detection of a CNS biomarker panel (127 proteins) in DPS and matched plasma, examining plasma–DPS correlations. A discovery cohort ( n = 14; mean age 71.1 ± 12.8 years; 8 females [57%]) was selected from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory in Mölndal, Sweden. DPS (Telimmune™ Plasma Separation Card) spiked with venous blood, were analysed with their paired EDTA plasma collected by traditional venipuncture. Pearson correlation was used to compare protein quantification across sample types. Result We demonstrated several biomarker associations between DPS and plasma with a correlation coefficient >0.99 and p <0.0001 (Figure 1), including APOe4 ( r = 0.996), IL6 ( r = 0.995), and FABP3 ( r = 0.994). Notably, AD‐related biomarkers like p ‐tau181 (r=0.89), p ‐tau231 (r=0.86), GFAP (r=0.8), NPTX2 (r=0.92), NFL (r=0.95), SMOC1 (r=0.91), and total Tau (r=0.93) all showed strong correlations and p <0.0001. DOPA decarboxylase, relevant for LBD and atypical Parkinsonian disorders, also correlated strongly (r=0.98, p <0.0001). VGF, a biomarker of synaptic plasticity altered in AD and Major Depressive Disorder showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.95, p <0.0001). Among 16 interleukins, 11 had r>0.8 ( p <0.0003) and 4 had r>0.5 ( p <0.05), with IL6 (r=0.995) and IL12 (r=0.994) correlating notably strong ( p <0.0001). However, 25% of proteins have a weak correlation coefficient of r<0.5 with plasma. Conclusion Our findings highlight the potential of DPS as a practical and scalable tool for multiplex biomarker detection. Further research is required to identify and validate optimal AD biomarkers in DPS‐based multiplex assays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106925
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiplex Biomarker Detection in Dried Plasma Spots: finding the best biomarker for remote blood collection

K. Blennow, Hanna Huber, Wiebke Traichel, Jakub Vávra et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Multiplex Biomarker Detection in Dried Plasma Spots: finding the best biomarker for remote blood collection

K. Blennow, Hanna Huber, Wiebke Traichel, Jakub Vávra, Andrea Benedet, Laia Montoliu‐Gaya, Nicholas Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Conventional blood sampling for the testing of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers depends on stringent, time‐sensitive, and temperature‐dependent protocols for processing, shipping, and storage. Dry plasma spots (DPS) present a simpler, more scalable alternative for the collection, storage, and transport of blood samples and may offer an alternative sampling when access to blood volume is limited. Notably, neurodegenerative biomarkers such as p ‐tau, NfL, and GFAP from DPS have demonstrated a strong correlation with paired plasma on other platforms. In this pilot study, we aimed to expand on these findings by exploring a broader panel of central nervous system (CNS) biomarkers using DPS, assessing their potential for reliable and accurate detection. Method We used the NULISA™ platform to test multiplex detection of a CNS biomarker panel (127 proteins) in DPS and matched plasma, examining plasma–DPS correlations. A discovery cohort ( n = 14; mean age 71.1 ± 12.8 years; 8 females [57%]) was selected from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory in Mölndal, Sweden. DPS (Telimmune™ Plasma Separation Card) spiked with venous blood, were analysed with their paired EDTA plasma collected by traditional venipuncture. Pearson correlation was used to compare protein quantification across sample types. Result We demonstrated several biomarker associations between DPS and plasma with a correlation coefficient >0.99 and p <0.0001 (Figure 1), including APOe4 ( r = 0.996), IL6 ( r = 0.995), and FABP3 ( r = 0.994). Notably, AD‐related biomarkers like p ‐tau181 (r=0.89), p ‐tau231 (r=0.86), GFAP (r=0.8), NPTX2 (r=0.92), NFL (r=0.95), SMOC1 (r=0.91), and total Tau (r=0.93) all showed strong correlations and p <0.0001. DOPA decarboxylase, relevant for LBD and atypical Parkinsonian disorders, also correlated strongly (r=0.98, p <0.0001). VGF, a biomarker of synaptic plasticity altered in AD and Major Depressive Disorder showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.95, p <0.0001). Among 16 interleukins, 11 had r>0.8 ( p <0.0003) and 4 had r>0.5 ( p <0.05), with IL6 (r=0.995) and IL12 (r=0.994) correlating notably strong ( p <0.0001). However, 25% of proteins have a weak correlation coefficient of r<0.5 with plasma. Conclusion Our findings highlight the potential of DPS as a practical and scalable tool for multiplex biomarker detection. Further research is required to identify and validate optimal AD biomarkers in DPS‐based multiplex assays.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), King's College London (GB), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Banner Health (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Profu (Sweden) (SE), Institut de Myologie (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), MRC Prion Unit (GB), Banner Health Foundation (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), Institut du Cerveau (FR), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.