Déjà Vu, All Over Again? Thickets, Webs and Contractual Governance Arising Out of the Protection of Traditional Knowledge Under the Nagoya Protocol

Pharmaceutical and biotechnological researchers have expressed fears that the access and benefit-sharing rights to traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources created by the Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity may cause “chilling” effects on pharmaceutical and biotechnological development. In seeking to understand to what degree such fears may be justified, this discussion questions of the nature of these rights, whether they are likely to form matrices of interlinked rights and, if so, the pattern such matrices may take. In doing so, it investigates comparisons with the structures of patent “thickets” arising in sequential complex technology areas and in the fields of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. It goes on to investigate whether there is any potential for contractual governance approaches to ameliorate any chilling effect of such access and benefit sharing rights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-11-13
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Déjà Vu, All Over Again? Thickets, Webs and Contractual Governance Arising Out of the Protection of Traditional Knowledge Under the Nagoya Protocol

PETER STUART HARRISON
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Déjà Vu, All Over Again? Thickets, Webs and Contractual Governance Arising Out of the Protection of Traditional Knowledge Under the Nagoya Protocol

PETER STUART HARRISON
article en

Abstract

Pharmaceutical and biotechnological researchers have expressed fears that the access and benefit-sharing rights to traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources created by the Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity may cause “chilling” effects on pharmaceutical and biotechnological development. In seeking to understand to what degree such fears may be justified, this discussion questions of the nature of these rights, whether they are likely to form matrices of interlinked rights and, if so, the pattern such matrices may take. In doing so, it investigates comparisons with the structures of patent “thickets” arising in sequential complex technology areas and in the fields of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. It goes on to investigate whether there is any potential for contractual governance approaches to ameliorate any chilling effect of such access and benefit sharing rights.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.