Open at the level of (para)text: critical intertextuality and discursive notation as open research practices in the humanities

This article contends that open research practices and principles are embedded in humanities research paradigms in ways that are not currently visible within either the open science-dominated framework of open research or the discourse of open qualitative research that is emerging as its corrective. Focusing on practices around citation (here framed as critical intertextuality) and discursive notation, I explore the ways in which these everyday practices of humanities discourse manifest forms of openness which should be more fully recognised within the discourse of open research. Occurring at a time when efforts to measure, incentivise and mandate open research at institutional, funder, journal and research assessment levels risk delegitimizing forms of enquiry that lie outside existing frameworks, such reconsiderations of unrecognised practices of openness in the humanities are both crucial and timely.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2026-04-16
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open at the level of (para)text: critical intertextuality and discursive notation as open research practices in the humanities

J. Adams
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Artistic and Creative Research
article

Open at the level of (para)text: critical intertextuality and discursive notation as open research practices in the humanities

J. Adams
article en

Abstract

This article contends that open research practices and principles are embedded in humanities research paradigms in ways that are not currently visible within either the open science-dominated framework of open research or the discourse of open qualitative research that is emerging as its corrective. Focusing on practices around citation (here framed as critical intertextuality) and discursive notation, I explore the ways in which these everyday practices of humanities discourse manifest forms of openness which should be more fully recognised within the discourse of open research. Occurring at a time when efforts to measure, incentivise and mandate open research at institutional, funder, journal and research assessment levels risk delegitimizing forms of enquiry that lie outside existing frameworks, such reconsiderations of unrecognised practices of openness in the humanities are both crucial and timely.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.