Examining individual sanctions for cartels under Indian antitrust law: exploring possibilities within corporate law for effective deterrence

A review of cartel cases decided by the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) between 2009 and 2024 reveals that in most cases directors or key managerial personnel have been closely involved in effecting cartel arrangements. While the CCI has used relevant statutory provisions to indict these individuals, the sanctioning mechanism has been largely inadequate for two reasons. First, the penalty imposed by the CCI has been grossly inadequate. Second, the CCI has been inconsistent in applying sections 48(1) and 48(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 in fixing accountability on company executives found to have indulged in cartelisation. Due to this inadequacy and inconsistency, the CCI has failed to create sufficient deterrence for individuals. In this article, we explore corporate law to address the issue of under-deterrence with specific reference to directors’ duties and disqualification provisions under the Companies Act, 2013.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Law Review
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2026.2613178
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining individual sanctions for cartels under Indian antitrust law: exploring possibilities within corporate law for effective deterrence

Sudhanshu Kumar, Nikita Shah
Indian Law Review
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Examining individual sanctions for cartels under Indian antitrust law: exploring possibilities within corporate law for effective deterrence

Sudhanshu Kumar, Nikita Shah
article en

Abstract

A review of cartel cases decided by the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) between 2009 and 2024 reveals that in most cases directors or key managerial personnel have been closely involved in effecting cartel arrangements. While the CCI has used relevant statutory provisions to indict these individuals, the sanctioning mechanism has been largely inadequate for two reasons. First, the penalty imposed by the CCI has been grossly inadequate. Second, the CCI has been inconsistent in applying sections 48(1) and 48(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 in fixing accountability on company executives found to have indulged in cartelisation. Due to this inadequacy and inconsistency, the CCI has failed to create sufficient deterrence for individuals. In this article, we explore corporate law to address the issue of under-deterrence with specific reference to directors’ duties and disqualification provisions under the Companies Act, 2013.

Indian Law ReviewVol. 10(1)
Nirma University (IN), National Law School of India University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.