Serum Lipase and Serum Amylase Levels in Non-Pancreatic Abdominal Pain versus Acute Pancreatitis in A Hospital in Eastern UP

Abstract Background: Acute pancreatitis is a life-threatening condition, quite often associated with gastrointestinal distress, and many complications can arise. Early diagnosis relies heavily on biochemical markers like serum amylase or lipase often in quite obscure clinical contexts. Diagnostic accuracy between these markers remains debated, especially when distinguishing AP from other causes of severe abdominal pain. Objectives: To assess and compare the serum lipase and serum amylase diagnostic value in distinguishing acute pancreatitis from non-pancreatic acute abdominal pain. Methods: In Eastern Uttar Pradesh, a tertiary care facility conducted prospective observational research on adult patients who presented with acute abdominal discomfort. Based on clinical, biochemical, and imaging criteria, patients were categorized into AP and non-pancreatic pain groups. Serum lipase and amylase levels were assessed 12–38 hours after the beginning of symptoms. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The mean age was 41.30 ± 14.96 years in the AP group and 44.87 ± 17.52 years in the non-pancreatic group (p = 0.144). Vomiting (24.39% vs 13.59%, p = 0.049) and constipation (18.29% vs 0%, p < 0.001) were significantly more common in the AP group. Mean serum amylase and lipase levels were significantly elevated in AP patients (amylase: 300.92 ± 265.70 U/L vs 84.45 ± 113.36 U/L; lipase: 177.44 ± 145.68 U/L vs 57.79 ± 36.09 U/L; both p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed serum amylase had an AUC of 0.847 (cut-off: 81 U/L, sensitivity 84.1%, specificity 65.5%) and serum lipase had an AUC of 0.823 (cut-off: 56 U/L, sensitivity 80.5%, specificity 62.1%). Conclusion: Both serum amylase and lipase are valuable diagnostic markers in acute pancreatitis, with amylase showing slightly better diagnostic performance in this cohort. Serum lipase remains a reliable and non-invasive tool, particularly when used in conjunction with clinical and imaging findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18196809
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serum Lipase and Serum Amylase Levels in Non-Pancreatic Abdominal Pain versus Acute Pancreatitis in A Hospital in Eastern UP

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Serum Lipase and Serum Amylase Levels in Non-Pancreatic Abdominal Pain versus Acute Pancreatitis in A Hospital in Eastern UP

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Acute pancreatitis is a life-threatening condition, quite often associated with gastrointestinal distress, and many complications can arise. Early diagnosis relies heavily on biochemical markers like serum amylase or lipase often in quite obscure clinical contexts. Diagnostic accuracy between these markers remains debated, especially when distinguishing AP from other causes of severe abdominal pain. Objectives: To assess and compare the serum lipase and serum amylase diagnostic value in distinguishing acute pancreatitis from non-pancreatic acute abdominal pain. Methods: In Eastern Uttar Pradesh, a tertiary care facility conducted prospective observational research on adult patients who presented with acute abdominal discomfort. Based on clinical, biochemical, and imaging criteria, patients were categorized into AP and non-pancreatic pain groups. Serum lipase and amylase levels were assessed 12–38 hours after the beginning of symptoms. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The mean age was 41.30 ± 14.96 years in the AP group and 44.87 ± 17.52 years in the non-pancreatic group (p = 0.144). Vomiting (24.39% vs 13.59%, p = 0.049) and constipation (18.29% vs 0%, p < 0.001) were significantly more common in the AP group. Mean serum amylase and lipase levels were significantly elevated in AP patients (amylase: 300.92 ± 265.70 U/L vs 84.45 ± 113.36 U/L; lipase: 177.44 ± 145.68 U/L vs 57.79 ± 36.09 U/L; both p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed serum amylase had an AUC of 0.847 (cut-off: 81 U/L, sensitivity 84.1%, specificity 65.5%) and serum lipase had an AUC of 0.823 (cut-off: 56 U/L, sensitivity 80.5%, specificity 62.1%). Conclusion: Both serum amylase and lipase are valuable diagnostic markers in acute pancreatitis, with amylase showing slightly better diagnostic performance in this cohort. Serum lipase remains a reliable and non-invasive tool, particularly when used in conjunction with clinical and imaging findings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Pharma (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.