Competition for Limited Visual Capacity Follows Feedforward Processing of a Distractor

The present study tested central predictions of our conceptual framework "distraction under competition" (DUC), including the extent to which semantic processing of emotional cues triggers competitive interactions among multiple stimuli. In situations in which stimuli compete for attentional processing resources, DUC proposes a time-delayed, biphasic process: An early feedforward gain elicited by the emotional distractor that needs to cross a certain threshold to trigger subsequent competitive interactions that results in the withdrawal of resources from a concurrent task stimulus. Competition was implemented by presenting naturalistic images in the background of a taxing foreground task. One emotional image was embedded in a stream of neutral images to trigger semantic categorization. The image stream and foreground task were frequency-tagged, thereby eliciting distinct steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), allowing us to analyze the respective amplitude time-courses that provide temporal dynamics of the shifting of attentional resources in competitive interactions. We replicated a significant enhancement of SSVEP amplitudes for emotional pictures that was greater for pleasant compared with unpleasant pictures, commencing at about 180 msec. The SSVEP amplitude driven by the foreground task was reduced from about 300 msec after the onset of a pleasant image only. Results support the biphasic time-delayed nature of resource allocation and suggest that the initial feedforward gain evoked by salient distractors may trigger subsequent competitive interactions. Formal modeling analyses showed a better fit of a biphasic process as proposed by DUC compared with a standard model based on divisive normalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.2431
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competition for Limited Visual Capacity Follows Feedforward Processing of a Distractor

Javier de Echegaray, Andreas Keil, Matthias M. Müller
1 citations
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
29.71
article

Competition for Limited Visual Capacity Follows Feedforward Processing of a Distractor

Javier de Echegaray, Andreas Keil, Matthias M. Müller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present study tested central predictions of our conceptual framework "distraction under competition" (DUC), including the extent to which semantic processing of emotional cues triggers competitive interactions among multiple stimuli. In situations in which stimuli compete for attentional processing resources, DUC proposes a time-delayed, biphasic process: An early feedforward gain elicited by the emotional distractor that needs to cross a certain threshold to trigger subsequent competitive interactions that results in the withdrawal of resources from a concurrent task stimulus. Competition was implemented by presenting naturalistic images in the background of a taxing foreground task. One emotional image was embedded in a stream of neutral images to trigger semantic categorization. The image stream and foreground task were frequency-tagged, thereby eliciting distinct steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), allowing us to analyze the respective amplitude time-courses that provide temporal dynamics of the shifting of attentional resources in competitive interactions. We replicated a significant enhancement of SSVEP amplitudes for emotional pictures that was greater for pleasant compared with unpleasant pictures, commencing at about 180 msec. The SSVEP amplitude driven by the foreground task was reduced from about 300 msec after the onset of a pleasant image only. Results support the biphasic time-delayed nature of resource allocation and suggest that the initial feedforward gain evoked by salient distractors may trigger subsequent competitive interactions. Formal modeling analyses showed a better fit of a biphasic process as proposed by DUC compared with a standard model based on divisive normalization.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
University of Florida (US), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
29.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.