AI agents in service experience: towards autonomous and conscious agency

Purpose Despite rapid advancements in AI and large language models (LLMs), there remains a critical gap in understanding how AI agents function as service actors and how they influence service processes and outcomes. This study addresses this gap by integrating AI agency and service experience dimensions, categorizing AI capabilities across six levels, from passive automation to fully conscious AI, and examining their impact on service workflows, human and multi-agent collaboration, and decision-making. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a conceptual approach, drawing from literature on service experience and AI agency. It illustrates real-world applications of AI agents in service settings and outlines a future research agenda to explore the strategic and ethical implications of AI-driven service ecosystems. Findings AI agents transform service experiences by shaping action, collaboration, processes, outcomes, and learning. Automaticity AI enhances process efficiency through task automation but lacks adaptability, while Relational AI improves personalization in customer and employee engagement. Cognitive AI enables data-driven decision-making, whereas Autonomous AI optimizes workflows without human oversight. Innovator AI drives service transformation, generating novel solutions such as AI-driven drug discovery, while Conscious Organizational AI raises governance and ethical concerns for strategic decision makers. Originality/value This study advances AI agency theory in service experience, offering a structured framework to guide AI agent integration and its impact on context, process, collaboration, action, outcome and learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124713
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI agents in service experience: towards autonomous and conscious agency

Mohamed Irfan Shaikh, Helen Zhao, David Díaz, Jan Hendrik Bluemel et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI agents in service experience: towards autonomous and conscious agency

Mohamed Irfan Shaikh, Helen Zhao, David Díaz, Jan Hendrik Bluemel, Mohamed Zaki, Ashen Joseph, Abdullah Al Assadi
article en

Abstract

Purpose Despite rapid advancements in AI and large language models (LLMs), there remains a critical gap in understanding how AI agents function as service actors and how they influence service processes and outcomes. This study addresses this gap by integrating AI agency and service experience dimensions, categorizing AI capabilities across six levels, from passive automation to fully conscious AI, and examining their impact on service workflows, human and multi-agent collaboration, and decision-making. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a conceptual approach, drawing from literature on service experience and AI agency. It illustrates real-world applications of AI agents in service settings and outlines a future research agenda to explore the strategic and ethical implications of AI-driven service ecosystems. Findings AI agents transform service experiences by shaping action, collaboration, processes, outcomes, and learning. Automaticity AI enhances process efficiency through task automation but lacks adaptability, while Relational AI improves personalization in customer and employee engagement. Cognitive AI enables data-driven decision-making, whereas Autonomous AI optimizes workflows without human oversight. Innovator AI drives service transformation, generating novel solutions such as AI-driven drug discovery, while Conscious Organizational AI raises governance and ethical concerns for strategic decision makers. Originality/value This study advances AI agency theory in service experience, offering a structured framework to guide AI agent integration and its impact on context, process, collaboration, action, outcome and learning.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.