Definitions of non-intimate partner and family-related femicide/feminicide: A scoping review

The killing of women and girls outside of intimate or domestic relationships - or non-intimate partner and family-related (non-IPF) femicide/feminicide - often triggers significant public and media attention. However, there has been comparatively little attention to non-IPF femicide/feminicide in research and policy, including how it is defined. To address this, we conducted a scoping review to identify current definitions of non-IPF femicide/feminicide and the types of evidence that exist in relation to these killings. The search strategy included electronic database searches (MEDLINE Complete, Social Policy and Practice, APA PsychInfo, Criminal Justice Abstracts with Full Text; Sociology Source Ultimate; Web of Science), citation-tracking, and hand searching non-governmental organisation websites (e.g., EIGE, UNODC, Femicide Watch). Sources were eligible for inclusion if they reported on women or girls aged 10 or above killed by non-intimate or non-domestic relations. Restrictions were not placed on study context, design or publication language. In total, 126 studies (140 reports) met the inclusion criteria. After describing the types of evidence, we present key definitions and summarise characteristics of victims, perpetrators and incidents of non-IPF femicide/feminicide reported in existing literature. Our findings demonstrate that non-IPF femicide/feminicide encompasses a wide range of types (e.g., sexual femicides, work-related homicides) as well as relationships (e.g., strangers, acquaintances, clients, and employers). However, we also found that a large proportion of studies did not substantively engage with the gendered contexts and motivations of killings. Our findings highlight the need for improved reporting of definitions and deeper engagement with the structural contexts surrounding non-IPF femicides/feminicides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118917
Primary Topic
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definitions of non-intimate partner and family-related femicide/feminicide: A scoping review

Merili Pullerits, Elizabeth A. Cook, Caroline Miles
Social Science & Medicine
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
article

Definitions of non-intimate partner and family-related femicide/feminicide: A scoping review

Merili Pullerits, Elizabeth A. Cook, Caroline Miles
article en

Abstract

The killing of women and girls outside of intimate or domestic relationships - or non-intimate partner and family-related (non-IPF) femicide/feminicide - often triggers significant public and media attention. However, there has been comparatively little attention to non-IPF femicide/feminicide in research and policy, including how it is defined. To address this, we conducted a scoping review to identify current definitions of non-IPF femicide/feminicide and the types of evidence that exist in relation to these killings. The search strategy included electronic database searches (MEDLINE Complete, Social Policy and Practice, APA PsychInfo, Criminal Justice Abstracts with Full Text; Sociology Source Ultimate; Web of Science), citation-tracking, and hand searching non-governmental organisation websites (e.g., EIGE, UNODC, Femicide Watch). Sources were eligible for inclusion if they reported on women or girls aged 10 or above killed by non-intimate or non-domestic relations. Restrictions were not placed on study context, design or publication language. In total, 126 studies (140 reports) met the inclusion criteria. After describing the types of evidence, we present key definitions and summarise characteristics of victims, perpetrators and incidents of non-IPF femicide/feminicide reported in existing literature. Our findings demonstrate that non-IPF femicide/feminicide encompasses a wide range of types (e.g., sexual femicides, work-related homicides) as well as relationships (e.g., strangers, acquaintances, clients, and employers). However, we also found that a large proportion of studies did not substantively engage with the gendered contexts and motivations of killings. Our findings highlight the need for improved reporting of definitions and deeper engagement with the structural contexts surrounding non-IPF femicides/feminicides.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 393
St George's, University of London (GB), University of Manchester (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Leverhulme Trust, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.