The Superiority of AVAPS Mode of Non-invasive Ventilation in Combination with HFNC Over HFNC Alone in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated by Respiratory Failure

ObjectiveThis paper was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of combining the Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) mode of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNC) oxygen therapy in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients complicated by respiratory failure.MethodsNinety-six patients with COPD and respiratory failure were enrolled and classified into a control group and an observation group. Both groups received conventional treatment. The control group was treated with AVAPS-mode NIV, while the observation group received additional HFNC. Clinical outcomes, adverse reactions, clinical indicators, blood gas parameters, serum inflammatory markers, and pulmonary function indicators were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe observation group had a significantly higher overall clinical response rate (93.75% vs 75.00%, <i>P</i> < 0.05), shorter ICU stays and mechanical ventilation times, lower respiratory rates, higher PaO<sub>2</sub>, SaO<sub>2</sub>, FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC values, and lower PaCO<sub>2</sub>, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and sTREM-1 levels than the control group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Heart rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The adverse reaction rate was significantly lower in the observation group relative to the control group (4.17% vs 18.75%, <i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionThis combined approach demonstrates superior efficacy in treating COPD patients with respiratory failure, improving arterial blood gas and pulmonary function, reducing inflammatory responses, and exhibiting a high safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251412806
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Superiority of AVAPS Mode of Non-invasive Ventilation in Combination with HFNC Over HFNC Alone in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated by Respiratory Failure

Guixiang Qin, Chunmei Yu, Jiaojiao Yang, Bingyan Ren et al.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

The Superiority of AVAPS Mode of Non-invasive Ventilation in Combination with HFNC Over HFNC Alone in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated by Respiratory Failure

Guixiang Qin, Chunmei Yu, Jiaojiao Yang, Bingyan Ren, Fenfen Chen
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis paper was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of combining the Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) mode of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNC) oxygen therapy in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients complicated by respiratory failure.MethodsNinety-six patients with COPD and respiratory failure were enrolled and classified into a control group and an observation group. Both groups received conventional treatment. The control group was treated with AVAPS-mode NIV, while the observation group received additional HFNC. Clinical outcomes, adverse reactions, clinical indicators, blood gas parameters, serum inflammatory markers, and pulmonary function indicators were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe observation group had a significantly higher overall clinical response rate (93.75% vs 75.00%, <i>P</i> < 0.05), shorter ICU stays and mechanical ventilation times, lower respiratory rates, higher PaO<sub>2</sub>, SaO<sub>2</sub>, FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC values, and lower PaCO<sub>2</sub>, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and sTREM-1 levels than the control group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Heart rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The adverse reaction rate was significantly lower in the observation group relative to the control group (4.17% vs 18.75%, <i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionThis combined approach demonstrates superior efficacy in treating COPD patients with respiratory failure, improving arterial blood gas and pulmonary function, reducing inflammatory responses, and exhibiting a high safety profile.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Nantong University (CN), Second People's Hospital of NanTong (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.