An Early Date for Acts? Dispensing with Some Recent Arguments

Abstract Several recent and noteworthy studies have advocated for an early dating (ca. 62–64) for Luke’s composition of Acts. This article evaluates each argument offered in favor of an early date in these studies and demonstrates that the assumptions undergirding them are problematic. After demonstrating that none of the arguments for an early date are conclusive, this article puts forward evidence that illustrates the viability of a later date for Acts (ca. 100–130). Finally, this article offers exegetical implications of accepting a later date for Acts, using the conclusion of Acts as a case study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin for Biblical Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/bullbiblrese.35.2.0239
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Early Date for Acts? Dispensing with Some Recent Arguments

Daniel Glover
Bulletin for Biblical Research
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

An Early Date for Acts? Dispensing with Some Recent Arguments

Daniel Glover
article en

Abstract

Abstract Several recent and noteworthy studies have advocated for an early dating (ca. 62–64) for Luke’s composition of Acts. This article evaluates each argument offered in favor of an early date in these studies and demonstrates that the assumptions undergirding them are problematic. After demonstrating that none of the arguments for an early date are conclusive, this article puts forward evidence that illustrates the viability of a later date for Acts (ca. 100–130). Finally, this article offers exegetical implications of accepting a later date for Acts, using the conclusion of Acts as a case study.

Bulletin for Biblical ResearchVol. 35(2)
Lee University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.