Correction to “Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients”

An outdated figure was used in the published version of the manuscript in results section "3.3 Inter-fraction robustness, figure 4".The old image that made it to the published version excluded the data for a 7th planning technique "30B 420L ELF + 2RS", which was added during the revision process.Below you can find the correct figure [4] with the accepted data included.F I G U R E 4 Robust target coverage metrics for IMPT and PAT plans generated using the ELF, ELSA and SPArc algorithms for six oropharyngeal cancer patients.Robust target coverage was evaluated on 42 weekly repeated CTs and accumulated over the repeat CTs for each patient.Dashed line = Cumulative coverage threshold, Box = interquartile range (25th-75th percentile), solid line = median, x = mean, whiskers = range, dots = outliers.We apologize for this error.

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Physics
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70233
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to “Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients”

Medical Physics
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Correction to “Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients”

article en

Abstract

An outdated figure was used in the published version of the manuscript in results section "3.3 Inter-fraction robustness, figure 4".The old image that made it to the published version excluded the data for a 7th planning technique "30B 420L ELF + 2RS", which was added during the revision process.Below you can find the correct figure [4] with the accepted data included.F I G U R E 4 Robust target coverage metrics for IMPT and PAT plans generated using the ELF, ELSA and SPArc algorithms for six oropharyngeal cancer patients.Robust target coverage was evaluated on 42 weekly repeated CTs and accumulated over the repeat CTs for each patient.Dashed line = Cumulative coverage threshold, Box = interquartile range (25th-75th percentile), solid line = median, x = mean, whiskers = range, dots = outliers.We apologize for this error.

Medical PhysicsVol. 53(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.