AI integration in writing skills of MUET students: a quasi-experimental study

This quasi-experimental study examines the effects of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted feedback on Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing performance among Form 6 students. A sample of 80 students from two Malaysian secondary schools who were matched in their Lower 6 examination results was randomly assigned to experimental (n=40, AI-assisted feedback) and control groups (n=40, traditional teacher feedback). Both groups received the same classroom writing instruction in a four-week intervention, and only the feedback provision channels are different. The experimental group employed AI writing supports (Grammarly, Hemingway Editor, QuillBot) which generated real-time automatic feedback on grammar, cohesio,organization and lexis diversity. Conventional written teacher feedback was provided to the control group 48-72 hours after attending standard MUET preparation programme.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24191/jca.v2i2.5886
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI integration in writing skills of MUET students: a quasi-experimental study

Peter Ong
UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

AI integration in writing skills of MUET students: a quasi-experimental study

Peter Ong
article en

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study examines the effects of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted feedback on Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing performance among Form 6 students. A sample of 80 students from two Malaysian secondary schools who were matched in their Lower 6 examination results was randomly assigned to experimental (n=40, AI-assisted feedback) and control groups (n=40, traditional teacher feedback). Both groups received the same classroom writing instruction in a four-week intervention, and only the feedback provision channels are different. The experimental group employed AI writing supports (Grammarly, Hemingway Editor, QuillBot) which generated real-time automatic feedback on grammar, cohesio,organization and lexis diversity. Conventional written teacher feedback was provided to the control group 48-72 hours after attending standard MUET preparation programme.

UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.