“Is larger always better?” An in vitro comparison of cyclical and static aspiration with different catheters in a neurovascular flow model

0.088″ catheters may be more effective for retrieving clots, except in cases of arterial collapse. CyA improves recanalization rates by reducing the risk of collapse associated with super-large bore catheters. A deeper understanding of catheter sizing and neurovascular anatomy could further optimize outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024554
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Is larger always better?” An in vitro comparison of cyclical and static aspiration with different catheters in a neurovascular flow model

Riccardo Tiberi, Magda Jabłońska, Cristina Márquez González, Jiahui Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
39.15
article

“Is larger always better?” An in vitro comparison of cyclical and static aspiration with different catheters in a neurovascular flow model

Riccardo Tiberi, Magda Jabłońska, Cristina Márquez González, Jiahui Li, Ariel Paredes Cruz, Marc Ribo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

0.088″ catheters may be more effective for retrieving clots, except in cases of arterial collapse. CyA improves recanalization rates by reducing the risk of collapse associated with super-large bore catheters. A deeper understanding of catheter sizing and neurovascular anatomy could further optimize outcomes.

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
39.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.