Punishing gender-affirming care: social media and U.S. anti-trans politics

Abstract Political communication relies heavily on digital platforms that reward hostile content with greater audience engagement. Following Executive Orders 14168 and 14187 in January 2025, the Trump administration orchestrated a rapid, multi-agency dismantling of institutional support for gender-affirming care. This article argues that these orders functioned simultaneously as administrative mandates and as social media content designed to discipline institutional infrastructure through an antagonistic “gender ideology” framing. The study traces how the directives became entangled with platform dynamics to consolidate affective publics around punitive state action. Following the orders, Trump mentions escalated from 0.9% to 80.2% of high-engagement transgender discourse, while the “gender ideology” frame became predominant, displacing neutral language. Rather than targeting individuals directly, the orders transformed bureaucratic retrenchment into an iterative social media spectacle. This study demonstrates how state authority leverages platform dynamics to mobilize publics around institutional punishment, framing digital populism as an enduring element of American governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Culture and Critique
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaf054
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punishing gender-affirming care: social media and U.S. anti-trans politics

Darius Scott
Communication Culture and Critique
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Punishing gender-affirming care: social media and U.S. anti-trans politics

Darius Scott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Political communication relies heavily on digital platforms that reward hostile content with greater audience engagement. Following Executive Orders 14168 and 14187 in January 2025, the Trump administration orchestrated a rapid, multi-agency dismantling of institutional support for gender-affirming care. This article argues that these orders functioned simultaneously as administrative mandates and as social media content designed to discipline institutional infrastructure through an antagonistic “gender ideology” framing. The study traces how the directives became entangled with platform dynamics to consolidate affective publics around punitive state action. Following the orders, Trump mentions escalated from 0.9% to 80.2% of high-engagement transgender discourse, while the “gender ideology” frame became predominant, displacing neutral language. Rather than targeting individuals directly, the orders transformed bureaucratic retrenchment into an iterative social media spectacle. This study demonstrates how state authority leverages platform dynamics to mobilize publics around institutional punishment, framing digital populism as an enduring element of American governance.

Communication Culture and Critique
McGill University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Punishing gender-affirming care: social media and U.S. anti-trans politics — Darius Scott · Communication Culture and Critique (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS