Adler’s Freedom of Self-Choice

Abstract: The subject of freedom of self-choice, as presented by Adler, is not unequivocal; it requires explanation. Adler’s claims about freedom of self-choice seem to include a contradiction. Here, we list these claims: (a) The child has freedom of choice in creating their lifestyle until the age of 5 years; (b) once lifestyle is established, every move of the individual is an expression of that lifestyle; and (c) everything can be different. The article offers a possible explanation for the apparent contradictions. This article addresses free self-choice given to every human being, including when their liberty is extremely limited. It also deals with the question of who feels grateful for having free self-choice and who rejects it or refuses to acknowledge its existence (i.e., “neurotics”).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œjournal of individual psychology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.00036
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adler’s Freedom of Self-Choice

Zivit Abramson
˜The œjournal of individual psychology
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Adler’s Freedom of Self-Choice

Zivit Abramson
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The subject of freedom of self-choice, as presented by Adler, is not unequivocal; it requires explanation. Adler’s claims about freedom of self-choice seem to include a contradiction. Here, we list these claims: (a) The child has freedom of choice in creating their lifestyle until the age of 5 years; (b) once lifestyle is established, every move of the individual is an expression of that lifestyle; and (c) everything can be different. The article offers a possible explanation for the apparent contradictions. This article addresses free self-choice given to every human being, including when their liberty is extremely limited. It also deals with the question of who feels grateful for having free self-choice and who rejects it or refuses to acknowledge its existence (i.e., “neurotics”).

˜The œjournal of individual psychologyVol. 81(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.