Application of a Known-fate Model to Evaluate Crayfish Mark Retention

Abstract Nail polish (paint) is a noninvasive, inexpensive external crayfish marking method for shorter-term studies (i.e., 30–90 d); however, retention time is seldom reported. Our objective was to estimate retention time of two nail-polish types (gel and lacquer) in a probabilistic framework using red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. We marked the carapace of 90 crayfish with six different bottles (treatments) of each type in an indoor raceway that mimicked natural habitat. We estimated nail-polish retention probability using a variation of a known-fate survival model. This approach retained information for crayfish that either molted or died prior to losing the mark (a minimum retention time). Both types had a >0.90 30-d and a >0.80 60-d retention probability. On average, 90-d retention was ~0.75 and ~0.65 for gel and lacquer, respectively. There was more variability in retention among treatments for gel. There was no retention relationship with carapace length. Males had ~0.05 higher mean retention than females. We found that both gel and lacquer nail polish were effective a shorter-term crayfish studies, though gel may be preferred for field studies due to its quicker drying time. Our study framework is applicable to any mark-retention study where individuals perish, molt, or otherwise go unseen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Crayfish
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5869/fc.2025.v30-1.89
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a Known-fate Model to Evaluate Crayfish Mark Retention

Robert Mollenhauer, Travis Waldrep
Freshwater Crayfish
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Application of a Known-fate Model to Evaluate Crayfish Mark Retention

Robert Mollenhauer, Travis Waldrep
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nail polish (paint) is a noninvasive, inexpensive external crayfish marking method for shorter-term studies (i.e., 30–90 d); however, retention time is seldom reported. Our objective was to estimate retention time of two nail-polish types (gel and lacquer) in a probabilistic framework using red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. We marked the carapace of 90 crayfish with six different bottles (treatments) of each type in an indoor raceway that mimicked natural habitat. We estimated nail-polish retention probability using a variation of a known-fate survival model. This approach retained information for crayfish that either molted or died prior to losing the mark (a minimum retention time). Both types had a >0.90 30-d and a >0.80 60-d retention probability. On average, 90-d retention was ~0.75 and ~0.65 for gel and lacquer, respectively. There was more variability in retention among treatments for gel. There was no retention relationship with carapace length. Males had ~0.05 higher mean retention than females. We found that both gel and lacquer nail polish were effective a shorter-term crayfish studies, though gel may be preferred for field studies due to its quicker drying time. Our study framework is applicable to any mark-retention study where individuals perish, molt, or otherwise go unseen.

Freshwater CrayfishVol. 30(1)
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Application of a Known-fate Model to Evaluate Crayfish Mark Retention — Robert Mollenhauer, Travis Waldrep · Freshwater Crayfish (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS