Low-cost fabrication and morphological analysis of ZnO nanostructures: Nanorods vs. nanoflowers

The growing research interest in ZnO nanostructures stems from their outstanding electronic and optoelectronic characteristics. By precisely tailoring their morphology and lattice parameters, it is possible to fine-tune their electronic, thermal, and catalytic behaviors. However, traditional techniques for determining lattice constants are often intricate and time-consuming, underscoring the need for a simpler and more dependable approach. In this work, ZnO nanorods and nanoflowers were synthesized using hydrothermal and sol–gel methods, with their structural and morphological features verified through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Optical reflectance spectra revealed minimal visible-light reflection (∼3–4%) and strong UV absorption, consistent with direct band gap transitions. Employing the Kubelka–Munk (K–M) model, the optical band gaps were estimated to be 3.11 eV for nanorods and 3.16 eV for nanoflowers. A simplified method for calculating lattice constants a and c from XRD data was introduced and validated against theoretical c/a ratios for the hexagonal wurtzite phase of ZnO. The obtained values exhibited excellent correlation with those from the X’Pert Highscore software-nanorods: a = 3.2319 Å, c = 5.2851 Å (software: a = 3.2499 Å, c = 5.2063 Å); nanoflowers: a = 3.2401 Å, c = 5.2911 Å (software: a = 3.1764 Å, c = 5.1939 Å)-with errors under 1.5%. These findings confirm the precision and robustness of the proposed calculation technique. Overall, this study presents a cost-effective route for synthesizing ZnO nanostructures with tunable properties, promising broad applicability in electronic, photonic, and catalytic technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hybrid Advances
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2026.100611
Primary Topic
ZnO doping and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-cost fabrication and morphological analysis of ZnO nanostructures: Nanorods vs. nanoflowers

Haider Abdulelah, Ban Hamdan Al-Mulla, Md.Dulal Haque, A. Nawabjan et al.
Hybrid Advances
ZnO doping and properties
article

Low-cost fabrication and morphological analysis of ZnO nanostructures: Nanorods vs. nanoflowers

Haider Abdulelah, Ban Hamdan Al-Mulla, Md.Dulal Haque, A. Nawabjan, Md.Ferdous Rahman, S.M. Hussin
article en

Abstract

The growing research interest in ZnO nanostructures stems from their outstanding electronic and optoelectronic characteristics. By precisely tailoring their morphology and lattice parameters, it is possible to fine-tune their electronic, thermal, and catalytic behaviors. However, traditional techniques for determining lattice constants are often intricate and time-consuming, underscoring the need for a simpler and more dependable approach. In this work, ZnO nanorods and nanoflowers were synthesized using hydrothermal and sol–gel methods, with their structural and morphological features verified through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Optical reflectance spectra revealed minimal visible-light reflection (∼3–4%) and strong UV absorption, consistent with direct band gap transitions. Employing the Kubelka–Munk (K–M) model, the optical band gaps were estimated to be 3.11 eV for nanorods and 3.16 eV for nanoflowers. A simplified method for calculating lattice constants a and c from XRD data was introduced and validated against theoretical c/a ratios for the hexagonal wurtzite phase of ZnO. The obtained values exhibited excellent correlation with those from the X’Pert Highscore software-nanorods: a = 3.2319 Å, c = 5.2851 Å (software: a = 3.2499 Å, c = 5.2063 Å); nanoflowers: a = 3.2401 Å, c = 5.2911 Å (software: a = 3.1764 Å, c = 5.1939 Å)-with errors under 1.5%. These findings confirm the precision and robustness of the proposed calculation technique. Overall, this study presents a cost-effective route for synthesizing ZnO nanostructures with tunable properties, promising broad applicability in electronic, photonic, and catalytic technologies.

Hybrid AdvancesVol. 12
University of Basrah (IQ), University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
ZnO doping and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Low-cost fabrication and morphological analysis of ZnO nanostructures: Nanorods vs. nanoflowers — Haider Abdulelah, Ban Hamdan Al-Mulla, et al. · Hybrid Advances (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS