Monodromic dark energy and DESI

Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Collaboration have renewed interest in dynamical dark energy models, particularly those that cross the “phantom divide” ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>w</a:mi> <a:mrow> <a:mi>DE</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> </a:math> ). We present leading observational constraints on , a physically motivated scalar field dark energy scenario capable of realizing rapid oscillations about the phantom divide. Using cosmic microwave background (CMB) information, DESI DR2 BAO measurements, and type Ia supernova observations, we constrain the amplitude, frequency, phase, and power-law index describing the monodromic k-essence scenario at the background level. We find that the monodromic dark energy scenario can fit these datasets with a <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>χ</c:mi> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:msup> </c:math> that is comparable to the phenomenological <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mn>0</e:mn> </e:msub> <e:mtext>−</e:mtext> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mi>a</e:mi> </e:msub> </e:math> parametrization. While the CMB and BAO data alone are consistent with the standard <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi> <g:mi>CDM</g:mi> </g:math> model, the inclusion of DESY5 supernovae shows a preference for a nonzero amplitude, <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:mi>A</j:mi> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>0.4</j:mn> <j:msubsup> <j:mn>4</j:mn> <j:mrow> <j:mo>−</j:mo> <j:mn>0.12</j:mn> </j:mrow> <j:mrow> <j:mo>+</j:mo> <j:mn>0.16</j:mn> </j:mrow> </j:msubsup> </j:math> (fully marginalized 68% CL). Conversely, inclusion of the Pantheon-Plus supernovae provides no evidence for monodromic k-essence, with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mi>A</l:mi> <l:mo>&lt;</l:mo> <l:mn>0.43</l:mn> </l:math> (95% CL). We show that constraints on both monodromic dark energy and <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mn>0</n:mn> </n:msub> <n:mtext>−</n:mtext> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mi>a</n:mi> </n:msub> </n:math> models are sensitive to the DESI DR2 LRG2 BAO distance, especially in the absence of supernova data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/396l-5txp
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
71.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monodromic dark energy and DESI

Fabian Schmidt, Marco Celoria, Anonymous
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
71.48
article

Monodromic dark energy and DESI

Fabian Schmidt, Marco Celoria, Anonymous
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Collaboration have renewed interest in dynamical dark energy models, particularly those that cross the “phantom divide” ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>w</a:mi> <a:mrow> <a:mi>DE</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> </a:math> ). We present leading observational constraints on , a physically motivated scalar field dark energy scenario capable of realizing rapid oscillations about the phantom divide. Using cosmic microwave background (CMB) information, DESI DR2 BAO measurements, and type Ia supernova observations, we constrain the amplitude, frequency, phase, and power-law index describing the monodromic k-essence scenario at the background level. We find that the monodromic dark energy scenario can fit these datasets with a <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>χ</c:mi> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:msup> </c:math> that is comparable to the phenomenological <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mn>0</e:mn> </e:msub> <e:mtext>−</e:mtext> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mi>a</e:mi> </e:msub> </e:math> parametrization. While the CMB and BAO data alone are consistent with the standard <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi> <g:mi>CDM</g:mi> </g:math> model, the inclusion of DESY5 supernovae shows a preference for a nonzero amplitude, <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:mi>A</j:mi> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>0.4</j:mn> <j:msubsup> <j:mn>4</j:mn> <j:mrow> <j:mo>−</j:mo> <j:mn>0.12</j:mn> </j:mrow> <j:mrow> <j:mo>+</j:mo> <j:mn>0.16</j:mn> </j:mrow> </j:msubsup> </j:math> (fully marginalized 68% CL). Conversely, inclusion of the Pantheon-Plus supernovae provides no evidence for monodromic k-essence, with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mi>A</l:mi> <l:mo>&lt;</l:mo> <l:mn>0.43</l:mn> </l:math> (95% CL). We show that constraints on both monodromic dark energy and <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mn>0</n:mn> </n:msub> <n:mtext>−</n:mtext> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mi>a</n:mi> </n:msub> </n:math> models are sensitive to the DESI DR2 LRG2 BAO distance, especially in the absence of supernova data.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(2)
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE), Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Biotecnologie (IT), Consorzio Interuniversitario Fisica Spaziale (IT), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
71.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.