Quantifying the therapeutic index of acupoints using measurements of effective and hazardous depths

Acupuncture needles are widely used to treat various medical conditions, but can occasionally lead to serious adverse events. The therapeutic index (TI), originally developed in pharmacology to quantify the safety margin between effective and toxic doses, provides a valuable potential framework for evaluating anatomical safety in acupuncture. We applied the TI concept to two commonly used acupoints—GB21 and ST36—by quantifying the TI value, defined as the ratio of the median hazardous depth (HD₅₀) to the median effective depth (ED₅₀), based on ultrasound-guided measurement and de-qi responses. Using ultrasound-guided measurements in 39 participants, we calculated the TI for each point and constructed cumulative distribution functions to visualize the therapeutic window. GB21 demonstrated a TI of 1.54, indicating a relatively wide safety margin, whereas ST36 had a TI of 1.09, reflecting a narrow and potentially risk-prone margin. These findings emphasize the impact of anatomical variability and highlight the need for personalized depth control in acupuncture practice. Our study provides preliminary evidence that integrating the TI concept into acupuncture safety assessment may support more individualized, data-driven needling strategies. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require confirmation in larger, demographically diverse populations and at additional acupoints before being generalized to routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative Medicine Research
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2026.101305
Primary Topic
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the therapeutic index of acupoints using measurements of effective and hazardous depths

Heeyoung Moon, Da-Eun Yoon, Dha-Hyun Choi, I Lee et al.
Integrative Medicine Research
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
article

Quantifying the therapeutic index of acupoints using measurements of effective and hazardous depths

Heeyoung Moon, Da-Eun Yoon, Dha-Hyun Choi, I Lee, Beomku Kang, Minjae Lee, Younbyoung Chae
article en

Abstract

Acupuncture needles are widely used to treat various medical conditions, but can occasionally lead to serious adverse events. The therapeutic index (TI), originally developed in pharmacology to quantify the safety margin between effective and toxic doses, provides a valuable potential framework for evaluating anatomical safety in acupuncture. We applied the TI concept to two commonly used acupoints—GB21 and ST36—by quantifying the TI value, defined as the ratio of the median hazardous depth (HD₅₀) to the median effective depth (ED₅₀), based on ultrasound-guided measurement and de-qi responses. Using ultrasound-guided measurements in 39 participants, we calculated the TI for each point and constructed cumulative distribution functions to visualize the therapeutic window. GB21 demonstrated a TI of 1.54, indicating a relatively wide safety margin, whereas ST36 had a TI of 1.09, reflecting a narrow and potentially risk-prone margin. These findings emphasize the impact of anatomical variability and highlight the need for personalized depth control in acupuncture practice. Our study provides preliminary evidence that integrating the TI concept into acupuncture safety assessment may support more individualized, data-driven needling strategies. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require confirmation in larger, demographically diverse populations and at additional acupoints before being generalized to routine clinical practice.

Integrative Medicine ResearchVol. 15(3)
Kyung Hee University (KR), Semyung University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.