Back to the past? Discourse coalitions in Italy's emerging nuclear policy debate

Nuclear energy is a technology that has long been subject to controversy, shaped by major global events, shifting public opinion and volatile policy agendas. Among industrialised democracies, Italy is a particularly distinctive case. Following a pioneering role in the 1950s and an ambitious, albeit partially implemented, nuclear programme in the 1970s, the Chernobyl disaster and the 1987 referendum resulted in the complete phase-out of nuclear power. A second referendum in 2011, following the Fukushima disaster, reaffirmed public opposition to any attempt to revive nuclear power. Despite these precedents, nuclear energy has recently returned to the political agenda. This initiative is embedded in broader European debates on the potential of nuclear power in decarbonization and energy security in the context of the crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This article uses discourse network analysis of media data to investigate the re-emerging debate on nuclear policy in Italy. Specifically, it examines the structure of the debate, the types of actors involved, their framing strategies, how discourse has evolved over time and how pro- and anti-nuclear coalitions have formed. The findings reveal that the Italian nuclear policy debate exhibits a hub-and-spoke structure, with influence concentrated among a small number of dominant actors. Over time, the debate has evolved from initial structuration to consolidation and pluralization in terms of actors, coalitions, and concepts. Nevertheless, despite some differences, pro-nuclear actors and coalitions retain significant visibility and influence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Back to the past? Discourse coalitions in Italy's emerging nuclear policy debate

Renata Lizzi, Claudia Mariotti, Laura Mastroianni, Andrea Prontera et al.
1 citations
Energy Strategy Reviews
Risk Perception and Management
55.57
article

Back to the past? Discourse coalitions in Italy's emerging nuclear policy debate

Renata Lizzi, Claudia Mariotti, Laura Mastroianni, Andrea Prontera, Paola Arrigoni, Luca Germano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nuclear energy is a technology that has long been subject to controversy, shaped by major global events, shifting public opinion and volatile policy agendas. Among industrialised democracies, Italy is a particularly distinctive case. Following a pioneering role in the 1950s and an ambitious, albeit partially implemented, nuclear programme in the 1970s, the Chernobyl disaster and the 1987 referendum resulted in the complete phase-out of nuclear power. A second referendum in 2011, following the Fukushima disaster, reaffirmed public opposition to any attempt to revive nuclear power. Despite these precedents, nuclear energy has recently returned to the political agenda. This initiative is embedded in broader European debates on the potential of nuclear power in decarbonization and energy security in the context of the crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This article uses discourse network analysis of media data to investigate the re-emerging debate on nuclear policy in Italy. Specifically, it examines the structure of the debate, the types of actors involved, their framing strategies, how discourse has evolved over time and how pro- and anti-nuclear coalitions have formed. The findings reveal that the Italian nuclear policy debate exhibits a hub-and-spoke structure, with influence concentrated among a small number of dominant actors. Over time, the debate has evolved from initial structuration to consolidation and pluralization in terms of actors, coalitions, and concepts. Nevertheless, despite some differences, pro-nuclear actors and coalitions retain significant visibility and influence.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 63
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Risk Perception and Management
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.