Expecting Less and Getting It: The Role of Rejection Sensitivity in Feedback-Seeking and Supervisory Relationships

While there is extensive literature on the strengths of different supervisory models, we have limited understanding of how the relational capacity of front-line staff may impact how they receive and seek feedback from their supervisor. This study examines how mental health providers’ and front-line staff’s own rejection sensitivity may be associated with the supervisory relationship and the ways in which job feedback is sought and received in community-based mental health settings. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 156 front-line staff of three mental health agencies. Staff were administered an original survey using validated measures related to supervision, feedback, and relational capacities. We found staff with a higher rejection sensitivity (RS) were less likely to actively seek feedback about their performance; and, when feedback was received, were more likely to rate its quality as poor. Staff with a higher RS were more likely to perceive their supervisor and their relationship negatively. This is the first study to examine whether workers’ relational capacities, as expressed through a higher RS, influence their perceptions of supervision and quality of feedback and their feedback-seeking behaviors. These findings build theory related to the important role that staff relational capacities play in influencing organizational dynamics and support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology International
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint8010005
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expecting Less and Getting It: The Role of Rejection Sensitivity in Feedback-Seeking and Supervisory Relationships

Alicia Mendez, Emily Adlin Bosk, Tareq Hardan, Michael MacKenzie et al.
Psychology International
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Expecting Less and Getting It: The Role of Rejection Sensitivity in Feedback-Seeking and Supervisory Relationships

Alicia Mendez, Emily Adlin Bosk, Tareq Hardan, Michael MacKenzie, Abigail Williams-Butler, Thomas Mackie
article en

Abstract

While there is extensive literature on the strengths of different supervisory models, we have limited understanding of how the relational capacity of front-line staff may impact how they receive and seek feedback from their supervisor. This study examines how mental health providers’ and front-line staff’s own rejection sensitivity may be associated with the supervisory relationship and the ways in which job feedback is sought and received in community-based mental health settings. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 156 front-line staff of three mental health agencies. Staff were administered an original survey using validated measures related to supervision, feedback, and relational capacities. We found staff with a higher rejection sensitivity (RS) were less likely to actively seek feedback about their performance; and, when feedback was received, were more likely to rate its quality as poor. Staff with a higher RS were more likely to perceive their supervisor and their relationship negatively. This is the first study to examine whether workers’ relational capacities, as expressed through a higher RS, influence their perceptions of supervision and quality of feedback and their feedback-seeking behaviors. These findings build theory related to the important role that staff relational capacities play in influencing organizational dynamics and support.

Psychology InternationalVol. 8(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), Bridgewater State University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), McGill University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.