On the value of indicators for large-scale water quality assessments

Global efforts to improve water quality under UN SDG 6.3.2 are undermined by disparate national monitoring standards that prevent coherent assessment. Additionally, water quality modeling can help to provide spatially continuous monitoring data for a set of water quality constituents, but not for all relevant indicators. This inconsistency hinders accountability in supply chains, management of biogeochemical cycles, and mitigation of transboundary pollution. To address this inconsistency, we evaluate and propose a core set of water quality indicators. We compare this proposed set against the against water quality constituents currently included in major international monitoring frameworks (e.g. nutrients, heavy metals, and microbial contaminants) and modeling projects, which simulate outputs like nutrient concentrations and pollutant loads, to identify key areas where modeling efforts could focus. Finally, we propose a tiered roadmap designed to achieve implementation of these core metrics, focusing on harmonizing existing outputs, filling model gaps, and incorporating emerging indicators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Water
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/3033-4942/ae3636
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the value of indicators for large-scale water quality assessments

Keerthana Suresh, Ilaria Micella, Albert Nkwasa, Simon N. Gosling et al.
Environmental Research Water
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
article

On the value of indicators for large-scale water quality assessments

Keerthana Suresh, Ilaria Micella, Albert Nkwasa, Simon N. Gosling, Floris Sebastiaan Rogier S.R Teuling, Nynke Hofstra, Rohini Kumar, Stijn Peeters
article en

Abstract

Global efforts to improve water quality under UN SDG 6.3.2 are undermined by disparate national monitoring standards that prevent coherent assessment. Additionally, water quality modeling can help to provide spatially continuous monitoring data for a set of water quality constituents, but not for all relevant indicators. This inconsistency hinders accountability in supply chains, management of biogeochemical cycles, and mitigation of transboundary pollution. To address this inconsistency, we evaluate and propose a core set of water quality indicators. We compare this proposed set against the against water quality constituents currently included in major international monitoring frameworks (e.g. nutrients, heavy metals, and microbial contaminants) and modeling projects, which simulate outputs like nutrient concentrations and pollutant loads, to identify key areas where modeling efforts could focus. Finally, we propose a tiered roadmap designed to achieve implementation of these core metrics, focusing on harmonizing existing outputs, filling model gaps, and incorporating emerging indicators.

Environmental Research WaterVol. 1(4)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the value of indicators for large-scale water quality assessments — Keerthana Suresh, Ilaria Micella, et al. · Environmental Research Water (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS