Red flags! Parents’ perspectives on data led policy and practice in family intervention

Family services in the UK are becoming increasingly reliant on technologies which merge and analyse personal data trails to inform policy and practice. Complex AI enabled tools are now regularly used to monitor and profile households, allocate resources, risk assess and target family interventions. This paper explores the impact of this technological transformation on parents by centring their views and experiences. Drawing on a mixed methods study we demonstrate how digital infrastructures are re-ordering family–state boundaries, bypassing the knowledge and consent of those impacted. The punitive, inflexible and in some cases deeply harmful consequences of data led practice for children and families are highlighted. We show how such negative encounters are cultivating mistrust and leading parents to actively avoid services seen as likely to link and profile personal data

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Social Policy
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183251410832
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red flags! Parents’ perspectives on data led policy and practice in family intervention

Sarah Gorin, Rosalind Edwards, Val Gillies
Critical Social Policy
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Red flags! Parents’ perspectives on data led policy and practice in family intervention

Sarah Gorin, Rosalind Edwards, Val Gillies
article en

Abstract

Family services in the UK are becoming increasingly reliant on technologies which merge and analyse personal data trails to inform policy and practice. Complex AI enabled tools are now regularly used to monitor and profile households, allocate resources, risk assess and target family interventions. This paper explores the impact of this technological transformation on parents by centring their views and experiences. Drawing on a mixed methods study we demonstrate how digital infrastructures are re-ordering family–state boundaries, bypassing the knowledge and consent of those impacted. The punitive, inflexible and in some cases deeply harmful consequences of data led practice for children and families are highlighted. We show how such negative encounters are cultivating mistrust and leading parents to actively avoid services seen as likely to link and profile personal data

Critical Social Policy
University of Oxford (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Red flags! Parents’ perspectives on data led policy and practice in family intervention — Sarah Gorin, Rosalind Edwards, et al. · Critical Social Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS