Benchmarking Peptide Spectral Library Search

Spectral library search (SLS) is a major approach for peptide identification from tandem mass spectrometry data, with performance depending substantially on the accuracy of the underlying Spectrum-Spectrum Matching (SSM) scoring functions. However, detailed comparative studies remain limited by the absence of comprehensive benchmark datasets. We propose new methods to build SSM scoring functions benchmarks and construct a benchmark dataset with (i) <i>eight</i> query spectrum sets with varying noise level for 476,063 precursors, and (ii) <i>three</i> spectral libraries with experimental, de-noised and predicted spectra for 3,065,819 precursors. We evaluate common spectrum preprocessing scenarios and SSM scoring functions, including SpectraST and EntropyScore. Results revealed this remains an important open problem, with the best recall for still assessed to be poor at just ∼70%, with SpectraST performing best for spectra with little-to-no noise, while JS-divergence showed superior noise resistance. Conversely, Cosine and Entropy score performed substantially worse, with Projected-Cosine performing especially poorly in most cases, with overall performance and relative ranking depending quite significantly on the minimum number of matching peaks. The benchmark dataset (MSV000095946/PXD056205) supports testing and development of new SSM scoring functions and the proposed benchmark construction approach provides an extensible foundation for additional types of SSM evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.08.698418
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Peptide Spectral Library Search

Hao Xu, Nuno Bandeira
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Benchmarking Peptide Spectral Library Search

Hao Xu, Nuno Bandeira
article en

Abstract

Spectral library search (SLS) is a major approach for peptide identification from tandem mass spectrometry data, with performance depending substantially on the accuracy of the underlying Spectrum-Spectrum Matching (SSM) scoring functions. However, detailed comparative studies remain limited by the absence of comprehensive benchmark datasets. We propose new methods to build SSM scoring functions benchmarks and construct a benchmark dataset with (i) <i>eight</i> query spectrum sets with varying noise level for 476,063 precursors, and (ii) <i>three</i> spectral libraries with experimental, de-noised and predicted spectra for 3,065,819 precursors. We evaluate common spectrum preprocessing scenarios and SSM scoring functions, including SpectraST and EntropyScore. Results revealed this remains an important open problem, with the best recall for still assessed to be poor at just ∼70%, with SpectraST performing best for spectra with little-to-no noise, while JS-divergence showed superior noise resistance. Conversely, Cosine and Entropy score performed substantially worse, with Projected-Cosine performing especially poorly in most cases, with overall performance and relative ranking depending quite significantly on the minimum number of matching peaks. The benchmark dataset (MSV000095946/PXD056205) supports testing and development of new SSM scoring functions and the proposed benchmark construction approach provides an extensible foundation for additional types of SSM evaluation.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of California San Diego (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.