Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study

Our results underline the potential of LLMs in answering medical examination questions and highlight the importance of careful consideration of model choice, prompt, and input languages, because of relevant performance variability across these factors. Analysis of answer explanations demonstrates a valuable use case of LLMs for improving examination question quality in medical education, if data security regulations permit their use. Human oversight of language-sensitive or clinically nuanced content remains essential to determine whether incorrect output stems from flaws in the questions themselves or from errors generated by the LLMs. There is a need for ongoing evaluation as well as transparent reporting to ensure reliable integration of LLMs into medical education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Education
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/81399
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study

Fabio Dennstädt, Livia Maria Strasser, Janna Hastings, Wilma Anschuetz
1 citations
JMIR Medical Education
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
52.10
article

Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study

Fabio Dennstädt, Livia Maria Strasser, Janna Hastings, Wilma Anschuetz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our results underline the potential of LLMs in answering medical examination questions and highlight the importance of careful consideration of model choice, prompt, and input languages, because of relevant performance variability across these factors. Analysis of answer explanations demonstrates a valuable use case of LLMs for improving examination question quality in medical education, if data security regulations permit their use. Human oversight of language-sensitive or clinically nuanced content remains essential to determine whether incorrect output stems from flaws in the questions themselves or from errors generated by the LLMs. There is a need for ongoing evaluation as well as transparent reporting to ensure reliable integration of LLMs into medical education contexts.

JMIR Medical EducationVol. 12
University of Bern (CH), University of Zurich (CH), University of St.Gallen (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH), Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study — Fabio Dennstädt, Livia Maria Strasser, et al. · JMIR Medical Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS