Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study
Our results underline the potential of LLMs in answering medical examination questions and highlight the importance of careful consideration of model choice, prompt, and input languages, because of relevant performance variability across these factors. Analysis of answer explanations demonstrates a valuable use case of LLMs for improving examination question quality in medical education, if data security regulations permit their use. Human oversight of language-sensitive or clinically nuanced content remains essential to determine whether incorrect output stems from flaws in the questions themselves or from errors generated by the LLMs. There is a need for ongoing evaluation as well as transparent reporting to ensure reliable integration of LLMs into medical education contexts.
Authors
- Fabio Dennstädt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-8720)
- Livia Maria Strasser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3664-5596)
- Janna Hastings (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923)
- Wilma Anschuetz
Institutions
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- University of St.Gallen (CH)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH)
- Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Medical Education
- Published
- 2026-01-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/81399
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 52.10