Towards a “repertoire interaction” model of ethnicity: “Becoming ‘Israel’” and available cultural repertoires

This article addresses lingering “groupist” challenges in the characterization of ethnic constructions through the lens of an unusual ethnogenetic phenomenon, the presence of multiple different claimants to an “Israelite” identity in many different places all around the world. It suggests that as this phenomenon has a somewhat obvious explanation – the corresponding popularity of biblical traditions themselves all around the world – it can help us think more clearly about what can be available for ethnic construction in a given context and why. It also suggests the need to shift focus from how peer-to-peer interactions lead to the articulation of ethnic visions to the role of interactions with available repertoires themselves, which it refers to as a “repertoire interaction” model of ethnic construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnicities
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968251413618
Primary Topic
Jewish Identity and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a “repertoire interaction” model of ethnicity: “Becoming ‘Israel’” and available cultural repertoires

Andrew Tobolowsky
Ethnicities
Jewish Identity and Society
article

Towards a “repertoire interaction” model of ethnicity: “Becoming ‘Israel’” and available cultural repertoires

Andrew Tobolowsky
article en

Abstract

This article addresses lingering “groupist” challenges in the characterization of ethnic constructions through the lens of an unusual ethnogenetic phenomenon, the presence of multiple different claimants to an “Israelite” identity in many different places all around the world. It suggests that as this phenomenon has a somewhat obvious explanation – the corresponding popularity of biblical traditions themselves all around the world – it can help us think more clearly about what can be available for ethnic construction in a given context and why. It also suggests the need to shift focus from how peer-to-peer interactions lead to the articulation of ethnic visions to the role of interactions with available repertoires themselves, which it refers to as a “repertoire interaction” model of ethnic construction.

Ethnicities
William & Mary (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Jewish Identity and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.