Tillage in southeastern US row crops reduces ground‐nesting bee incidence and diversity compared to field edges

Abstract Pollination services provided by native bees are vital to the success of flowering plants in agricultural production and natural ecosystems. There are concerns that many native bee species are in decline due to multiple concurrent factors stemming from practices adopted by industrial agricultural production systems, such as the loss of suitable habitat, lack of floral resources and pesticide exposure. Most bee species in North America rear their offspring below ground and are potentially vulnerable to soil management activities, such as tillage operations in row crop settings. We investigated the effects of tillage on ground‐nesting bees in a row crop system by intensively sampling bees nesting within treatments representative of standard tillage practices employed in the Southeastern United States. Our study is among the first to investigate how tillage regimes shape entire bee assemblages in intensively managed US croplands; by contrast, most previous research has focused almost exclusively on the squash bee, Eucera (Peponapis) pruinosa (Say, 1837), and has produced mixed results We found strong evidence that ground‐nesting bee incidence, abundance and diversity declined to varying degrees in all tilled treatments compared to field edges. Clarifying whether tilled fields act as ecological sinks or are simply avoided as unsuitable habitat will be critical for guiding conservation efforts that prioritise the preservation and enhancement of semi‐natural margins in agricultural landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.70054
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tillage in southeastern US row crops reduces ground‐nesting bee incidence and diversity compared to field edges

Anthony Cuminale, Kipling S. Balkcom, Joshua W. Campbell, Anthony P. Abbate et al.
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Plant and animal studies
article

Tillage in southeastern US row crops reduces ground‐nesting bee incidence and diversity compared to field edges

Anthony Cuminale, Kipling S. Balkcom, Joshua W. Campbell, Anthony P. Abbate, Geoffrey R. Williams
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pollination services provided by native bees are vital to the success of flowering plants in agricultural production and natural ecosystems. There are concerns that many native bee species are in decline due to multiple concurrent factors stemming from practices adopted by industrial agricultural production systems, such as the loss of suitable habitat, lack of floral resources and pesticide exposure. Most bee species in North America rear their offspring below ground and are potentially vulnerable to soil management activities, such as tillage operations in row crop settings. We investigated the effects of tillage on ground‐nesting bees in a row crop system by intensively sampling bees nesting within treatments representative of standard tillage practices employed in the Southeastern United States. Our study is among the first to investigate how tillage regimes shape entire bee assemblages in intensively managed US croplands; by contrast, most previous research has focused almost exclusively on the squash bee, Eucera (Peponapis) pruinosa (Say, 1837), and has produced mixed results We found strong evidence that ground‐nesting bee incidence, abundance and diversity declined to varying degrees in all tilled treatments compared to field edges. Clarifying whether tilled fields act as ecological sinks or are simply avoided as unsuitable habitat will be critical for guiding conservation efforts that prioritise the preservation and enhancement of semi‐natural margins in agricultural landscapes.

Insect Conservation and Diversity
Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory (US), National Soil Dynamics Research Laboratory (US), Auburn University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.