USE AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON THE MOST COMMON DERMATOLOGIC DISORDEERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

This systematically conducted narrative review explores the quality and reliability of dermatology-related information available on YouTube. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Scopus (up to November 2024) identified 8,521 records, of which 25 studies met the inclusion criteria addressing six major dermatologic topics: hidradenitis suppurativa, acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, skin cancer, and Mohs micrographic surgery. Across conditions, YouTube was found to be a popular platform for health information seeking, yet most videos were created by non-medical individuals and exhibited low educational quality based on validated instruments such as DISCERN, JAMA, and the Global Quality Scale. Common issues included incomplete, misleading, or unreferenced information, with misleading content often attracting higher engagement than professional materials. While videos produced by healthcare professionals were generally more accurate, they represented a minority and achieved limited visibility. Despite YouTube’s potential for public health education, current dermatology-related content often fails to meet evidence-based standards. These findings highlight the urgent need for dermatologists and professional organizations to create and promote high-quality, comprehensible, and reliable video content to improve public understanding, counter misinformation, and support informed patient decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4168
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

USE AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON THE MOST COMMON DERMATOLOGIC DISORDEERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Julia Kropidłowska, Aleksandra Kujach
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

USE AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON THE MOST COMMON DERMATOLOGIC DISORDEERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Julia Kropidłowska, Aleksandra Kujach
article en

Abstract

This systematically conducted narrative review explores the quality and reliability of dermatology-related information available on YouTube. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Scopus (up to November 2024) identified 8,521 records, of which 25 studies met the inclusion criteria addressing six major dermatologic topics: hidradenitis suppurativa, acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, skin cancer, and Mohs micrographic surgery. Across conditions, YouTube was found to be a popular platform for health information seeking, yet most videos were created by non-medical individuals and exhibited low educational quality based on validated instruments such as DISCERN, JAMA, and the Global Quality Scale. Common issues included incomplete, misleading, or unreferenced information, with misleading content often attracting higher engagement than professional materials. While videos produced by healthcare professionals were generally more accurate, they represented a minority and achieved limited visibility. Despite YouTube’s potential for public health education, current dermatology-related content often fails to meet evidence-based standards. These findings highlight the urgent need for dermatologists and professional organizations to create and promote high-quality, comprehensible, and reliable video content to improve public understanding, counter misinformation, and support informed patient decision-making.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 3(4(48))
University Clinical Centre (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.