“My lived experience was valued”: Co-designing ‘OA Champions’ – A pain science-informed peer mentorship program for people with knee osteoarthritis

Access to first-line care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. Peer-led strategies offer a promising alternative for delivering support and up-to-date information to help individuals manage knee OA. This study used a co-design approach to develop a pain science-informed peer mentorship program to support knee OA self-management. Peer mentorship involves one-to-one tailored support delivered by a trained mentor with the same condition. Co-design ensures meaningful involvement of end-users across all stages of program development, guaranteeing their needs and preferences are captured. Individuals with knee OA were engaged as equal partners across one rural and four metropolitan co-design workshops. Guided by the Double Diamond design process, workshops utilized a range of participatory strategies and involved both researcher-led and co-researcher-led analysis. Twenty-seven co-researchers (mean age 65.1 [SD 9.3] years; 59% female) participated across the workshops. Co-researchers identified unmet support needs throughout the knee OA journey and informed the type of support that could be offered by peer mentors in these situations, drawing from lived experience. Key components of the program were also informed, including preference for a blended mentor training model, considerations for mentor-mentee matching, the development of mentorship session cards, and the importance of session monitoring. The co-designed peer mentorship program, now ready for pilot feasibility testing, offers a flexible intervention that can be tailored to individual support needs, promoting self-management and disseminating contemporary pain science education. Strong evidence of meaningful end-user involvement also positions this study as an exemplar for engaging people with lived experience in developing complex interventions. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a multi-stage co-design process that meaningfully involved people with lived experience of knee osteoarthritis to develop a pain-science informed peer mentorship program supporting self-management. Aligning with end-user needs and preferences, the flexible program can be tailored to individual support needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106193
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“My lived experience was valued”: Co-designing ‘OA Champions’ – A pain science-informed peer mentorship program for people with knee osteoarthritis

Monique V. Wilson, John B. Arnold, F BRAITHWAITE, T. Stanton et al.
Journal of Pain
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

“My lived experience was valued”: Co-designing ‘OA Champions’ – A pain science-informed peer mentorship program for people with knee osteoarthritis

Monique V. Wilson, John B. Arnold, F BRAITHWAITE, T. Stanton, Ian Gwilt, Stuart Campbell, John Porton, Olivia Petropoulos, Aaron Davis
article en

Abstract

Access to first-line care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. Peer-led strategies offer a promising alternative for delivering support and up-to-date information to help individuals manage knee OA. This study used a co-design approach to develop a pain science-informed peer mentorship program to support knee OA self-management. Peer mentorship involves one-to-one tailored support delivered by a trained mentor with the same condition. Co-design ensures meaningful involvement of end-users across all stages of program development, guaranteeing their needs and preferences are captured. Individuals with knee OA were engaged as equal partners across one rural and four metropolitan co-design workshops. Guided by the Double Diamond design process, workshops utilized a range of participatory strategies and involved both researcher-led and co-researcher-led analysis. Twenty-seven co-researchers (mean age 65.1 [SD 9.3] years; 59% female) participated across the workshops. Co-researchers identified unmet support needs throughout the knee OA journey and informed the type of support that could be offered by peer mentors in these situations, drawing from lived experience. Key components of the program were also informed, including preference for a blended mentor training model, considerations for mentor-mentee matching, the development of mentorship session cards, and the importance of session monitoring. The co-designed peer mentorship program, now ready for pilot feasibility testing, offers a flexible intervention that can be tailored to individual support needs, promoting self-management and disseminating contemporary pain science education. Strong evidence of meaningful end-user involvement also positions this study as an exemplar for engaging people with lived experience in developing complex interventions. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a multi-stage co-design process that meaningfully involved people with lived experience of knee osteoarthritis to develop a pain-science informed peer mentorship program supporting self-management. Aligning with end-user needs and preferences, the flexible program can be tailored to individual support needs.

Journal of PainVol. 40
Arts South Australia (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.