Exploring the implementation of an ICF-based instrument and guideline for interprofessional collaboration in the return-to-work process

BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration among occupational health professionals (OHPs) is essential for guiding sick-listed employees and facilitating return to work (RTW). However, the lack of a shared language among different OHPs can hinder effective collaboration. To address this, an instrument and multidisciplinary guideline based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) were developed.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of the ICF-based instrument and multidisciplinary guideline, as well as to explore OHPs' experiences to support implementation in daily practice.MethodsA triangulated mixed-methods design was used, combining OHPs assessing work capacity with the instrument in practice for sick-listed employees, followed by interviews, case reviews, and focus groups with both medical and non-medical OHPs. The Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Implementation (MIDI) guided data collection and analysis.ResultsOHPs experienced the ICF-based instrument as comprehensible, usable for providing sick leave guidance, and particularly valuable for enabling qualitative assessments of work capacity and RTW possibilities. The so-called d-codes included in the instrument, derived from the ICF-framework, facilitated communication between medical and non-medical professionals. OHPs also found the instrument supported shared decision-making by incorporating both employees' and employers' perspectives. Application was especially suited for complex cases of long-term sick leave.ConclusionsThis study highlights the potential of implementing the ICF-based instrument and multidisciplinary guideline in occupational health practice to improve interprofessional collaboration during sick leave and RTW. OHPs reported that the instrument supports capturing both the strengths and limitations of sick-listed employees, while also addressing workplace and personal factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251409721
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the implementation of an ICF-based instrument and guideline for interprofessional collaboration in the return-to-work process

Bouwine Carlier, Frederieke Schaafsma, Shirley Oomens, J.R. Anema et al.
Work
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Exploring the implementation of an ICF-based instrument and guideline for interprofessional collaboration in the return-to-work process

Bouwine Carlier, Frederieke Schaafsma, Shirley Oomens, J.R. Anema, Donny C. C. Kreuger, Birgit HPM Donker-Cools
article en

Abstract

BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration among occupational health professionals (OHPs) is essential for guiding sick-listed employees and facilitating return to work (RTW). However, the lack of a shared language among different OHPs can hinder effective collaboration. To address this, an instrument and multidisciplinary guideline based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) were developed.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of the ICF-based instrument and multidisciplinary guideline, as well as to explore OHPs' experiences to support implementation in daily practice.MethodsA triangulated mixed-methods design was used, combining OHPs assessing work capacity with the instrument in practice for sick-listed employees, followed by interviews, case reviews, and focus groups with both medical and non-medical OHPs. The Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Implementation (MIDI) guided data collection and analysis.ResultsOHPs experienced the ICF-based instrument as comprehensible, usable for providing sick leave guidance, and particularly valuable for enabling qualitative assessments of work capacity and RTW possibilities. The so-called d-codes included in the instrument, derived from the ICF-framework, facilitated communication between medical and non-medical professionals. OHPs also found the instrument supported shared decision-making by incorporating both employees' and employers' perspectives. Application was especially suited for complex cases of long-term sick leave.ConclusionsThis study highlights the potential of implementing the ICF-based instrument and multidisciplinary guideline in occupational health practice to improve interprofessional collaboration during sick leave and RTW. OHPs reported that the instrument supports capturing both the strengths and limitations of sick-listed employees, while also addressing workplace and personal factors.

Work
HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.