Marginal Cost of Carbon Sequestration Using Straw-Based Biochar in Great Britain

Achieving the net-zero target of the United Kingdom requires substantial greenhouse gas removal (GGR) in addition to emission reductions. Biochar, a stable carbon-rich material produced through biomass pyrolysis, is an established GGR method. Straw is abundantly available in the UK and presents a viable option for large-scale biochar production. However, uncertainties regarding its feasibility remain, particularly concerning costs, spatial constraints, and facility construction. Here, we use a spatial model integrated with life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis to estimate the marginal cost curve for net carbon sequestration through straw-based biochar production in Great Britain (GB). Our findings reveal that straw-based biochar production in GB can achieve 0.6-1.9% of the UK's 2050 carbon removal target at marginal costs below £75 per tCO<sub>2</sub>e. If higher-cost options are also included (i.e., without the £75 per tCO<sub>2</sub>e constraint), the total potential removal increases to 0.8-2.1%. The marginal costs are significantly influenced by the price and availability of feedstock, the value of byproducts, and the biochar yield. Our integrated spatial model helps identify optimal feedstock supply and production strategies, reducing costs and uncertainties in net carbon sequestration for biochar systems. This study elucidates the challenges and limitations of utilizing straw for large-scale biochar production in GB to support the climate change mitigation pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11115
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marginal Cost of Carbon Sequestration Using Straw-Based Biochar in Great Britain

Yuzhou Tang, Tim Cockrill, Paul N. Wilson
Environmental Science & Technology
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Marginal Cost of Carbon Sequestration Using Straw-Based Biochar in Great Britain

Yuzhou Tang, Tim Cockrill, Paul N. Wilson
article en

Abstract

Achieving the net-zero target of the United Kingdom requires substantial greenhouse gas removal (GGR) in addition to emission reductions. Biochar, a stable carbon-rich material produced through biomass pyrolysis, is an established GGR method. Straw is abundantly available in the UK and presents a viable option for large-scale biochar production. However, uncertainties regarding its feasibility remain, particularly concerning costs, spatial constraints, and facility construction. Here, we use a spatial model integrated with life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis to estimate the marginal cost curve for net carbon sequestration through straw-based biochar production in Great Britain (GB). Our findings reveal that straw-based biochar production in GB can achieve 0.6-1.9% of the UK's 2050 carbon removal target at marginal costs below £75 per tCO<sub>2</sub>e. If higher-cost options are also included (i.e., without the £75 per tCO<sub>2</sub>e constraint), the total potential removal increases to 0.8-2.1%. The marginal costs are significantly influenced by the price and availability of feedstock, the value of byproducts, and the biochar yield. Our integrated spatial model helps identify optimal feedstock supply and production strategies, reducing costs and uncertainties in net carbon sequestration for biochar systems. This study elucidates the challenges and limitations of utilizing straw for large-scale biochar production in GB to support the climate change mitigation pathway.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 60(3)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Nottingham (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.