Environmental variability shapes biodiversity and protected area priorities in Canada

Priority areas are typically identified based on mean conditions, while ignoring variance around the mean (i.e., "stochasticity'). This is problematic as high environmental stochasticity can increase extinction risk and reduce the effectiveness of protected areas. Here we use daily Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data from 1981 to 2025 to generate spatially-explicit estimates of both the mean and variance in environmental productivity across Canada. From these models, we found that environmental stochasticity shows strong spatial structure and has been steadily increasing over the past four decades. Additionally, stochasticity had a negative effect on species richness. We found no clear relationship between stochasticity and protection status, suggesting that Canada's network of protected areas are not well-buffered against a climate-change induced increase in stochasticity. Promisingly, we identified 2,709,580 km<sup>2</sup> of currently unprotected land that may minimise the impact(s) of growing stochasticity. This work provides a framework for incorporating environmental stochasticity into conservation planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03166-4
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental variability shapes biodiversity and protected area priorities in Canada

Stefano Mezzini, Michael Noonan, Rekha Marcus, Dwija Desai
Communications Earth & Environment
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Environmental variability shapes biodiversity and protected area priorities in Canada

Stefano Mezzini, Michael Noonan, Rekha Marcus, Dwija Desai
article en

Abstract

Priority areas are typically identified based on mean conditions, while ignoring variance around the mean (i.e., "stochasticity'). This is problematic as high environmental stochasticity can increase extinction risk and reduce the effectiveness of protected areas. Here we use daily Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data from 1981 to 2025 to generate spatially-explicit estimates of both the mean and variance in environmental productivity across Canada. From these models, we found that environmental stochasticity shows strong spatial structure and has been steadily increasing over the past four decades. Additionally, stochasticity had a negative effect on species richness. We found no clear relationship between stochasticity and protection status, suggesting that Canada's network of protected areas are not well-buffered against a climate-change induced increase in stochasticity. Promisingly, we identified 2,709,580 km<sup>2</sup> of currently unprotected land that may minimise the impact(s) of growing stochasticity. This work provides a framework for incorporating environmental stochasticity into conservation planning.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Okanagan University College (CA)
Universities Space Research Association, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.