Real-world evaluation of the use of melanoma risk prediction tools by clinicians in Australia: a mixed-methods study
Melanoma risk prediction tools have been developed to assist with estimating a person’s risk of developing a primary melanoma, yet their integration into clinical practice and their influence on decision making remains poorly understood. Using a mixed-methods approach, we aimed to evaluate the use of two online melanoma risk prediction tools – one for estimating risk of a first primary melanoma and the other for estimating risk of a subsequent primary melanoma – by clinicians in Australia. We found that the first primary and subsequent primary melanoma risk prediction tools were accepted by clinicians for use in routine practice; however, variability in their use and challenges in interpreting and applying risk results may hinder their full potential.
Authors
- Yoon Jung Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-5110)
- Caroline G. Watts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-4797)
- R Scolyer
- Linda K. Martin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-7077)
- D. Nicolás Espinoza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-0180)
- Gillian Reyes-Marcelino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-0961)
- Rehana Salam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5017-5648)
- Alexander H R Varey
- Anne E Cust
- Amelia K. Smit
- Serigne N Lo
- Pascale Guitera
- Georgina V Long
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Melanoma Institute Australia (AU)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
- Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Published
- 2026-01-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljag003
- Primary Topic
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00