Real-world evaluation of the use of melanoma risk prediction tools by clinicians in Australia: a mixed-methods study

Melanoma risk prediction tools have been developed to assist with estimating a person’s risk of developing a primary melanoma, yet their integration into clinical practice and their influence on decision making remains poorly understood. Using a mixed-methods approach, we aimed to evaluate the use of two online melanoma risk prediction tools – one for estimating risk of a first primary melanoma and the other for estimating risk of a subsequent primary melanoma – by clinicians in Australia. We found that the first primary and subsequent primary melanoma risk prediction tools were accepted by clinicians for use in routine practice; however, variability in their use and challenges in interpreting and applying risk results may hinder their full potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljag003
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world evaluation of the use of melanoma risk prediction tools by clinicians in Australia: a mixed-methods study

Yoon Jung Kang, Caroline G. Watts, R Scolyer, Linda K. Martin et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Real-world evaluation of the use of melanoma risk prediction tools by clinicians in Australia: a mixed-methods study

Yoon Jung Kang, Caroline G. Watts, R Scolyer, Linda K. Martin, D. Nicolás Espinoza, Gillian Reyes-Marcelino, Rehana Salam, Alexander H R Varey, Anne E Cust, Amelia K. Smit, Serigne N Lo, Pascale Guitera, Georgina V Long
article en

Abstract

Melanoma risk prediction tools have been developed to assist with estimating a person’s risk of developing a primary melanoma, yet their integration into clinical practice and their influence on decision making remains poorly understood. Using a mixed-methods approach, we aimed to evaluate the use of two online melanoma risk prediction tools – one for estimating risk of a first primary melanoma and the other for estimating risk of a subsequent primary melanoma – by clinicians in Australia. We found that the first primary and subsequent primary melanoma risk prediction tools were accepted by clinicians for use in routine practice; however, variability in their use and challenges in interpreting and applying risk results may hinder their full potential.

British Journal of Dermatology
The University of Sydney (AU), Melanoma Institute Australia (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real-world evaluation of the use of melanoma risk prediction tools by clinicians in Australia: a mixed-methods study — Yoon Jung Kang, Caroline G. Watts, et al. · British Journal of Dermatology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS