Is “Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy” a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Renchamo Kikon Department of General Surgery, Zion Hospital, Dimapur, Nagaland, IndiaCorrespondence: Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Email [email protected] and Importance: Advances in endourology have greatly reduced open stone surgeries (OSS) worldwide. However, in some rural areas of developing countries, PNL for large, complex stones is not feasible due to limited resources and lack of angioembolisation. We share our experience in such cases.Materials and Methods: Using STROCSS 2025 and PROCESS 2023 checklists, we outlined objectives and reported a case series. From January 2012 to June 2023, 2241 patients had surgery for urinary stones at a rural hospital: 286 PNL, 1625 URS, 281 RIRS, and 49 OSS. We retrospectively analysed demographic data, stone burden, surgical techniques, and outcomes.Outcomes: There were 23 men and 26 women, aged 31 to 66 (average: 52 years). CSB was included in 46 patients (93.8%), and CSB with PUJ obstruction in 3 patients (6.12%). Procedures were pyelolithotomy (26.53%), extended pyelolithotomy (38.77%), and pyelolithotomy with lower calyceal nephrotomy (24.48%). Mandatory intraoperative nephroscopy was used to remove calyceal stones. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 47 cases (95.9%) at discharge and 3-month CT. Two patients (4.08%) had residual fragments needing RIRS at 3 months. The mean operative time was 88.67 min (70– 120), and hospital stay averaged 5.87 days (5– 8). The follow-up period averaged 24.48 months (24– 30). Intraoperative complications occurred in 10.20%, and significant postoperative complications in seven cases (14.28%), including sepsis, urinary leakage, chest effusion, and wound issues.Conclusion: Single-session OSS with Nephroscopic clearance can achieve a higher stone-free rate. Although the morbidity of OSS is considerably higher than that of PNL, it may be safe and effective for managing complex stone burdens in resource-constrained rural areas of developing countries.Keywords: complex renal stones, open stone surgery, rural kidney stones, intraoperative nephroscopy, case series, calycotomy

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-01-08
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is “Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy” a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Renchamo Kikon
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Is “Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy” a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Renchamo Kikon
article en

Abstract

Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Renchamo Kikon Department of General Surgery, Zion Hospital, Dimapur, Nagaland, IndiaCorrespondence: Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Email [email protected] and Importance: Advances in endourology have greatly reduced open stone surgeries (OSS) worldwide. However, in some rural areas of developing countries, PNL for large, complex stones is not feasible due to limited resources and lack of angioembolisation. We share our experience in such cases.Materials and Methods: Using STROCSS 2025 and PROCESS 2023 checklists, we outlined objectives and reported a case series. From January 2012 to June 2023, 2241 patients had surgery for urinary stones at a rural hospital: 286 PNL, 1625 URS, 281 RIRS, and 49 OSS. We retrospectively analysed demographic data, stone burden, surgical techniques, and outcomes.Outcomes: There were 23 men and 26 women, aged 31 to 66 (average: 52 years). CSB was included in 46 patients (93.8%), and CSB with PUJ obstruction in 3 patients (6.12%). Procedures were pyelolithotomy (26.53%), extended pyelolithotomy (38.77%), and pyelolithotomy with lower calyceal nephrotomy (24.48%). Mandatory intraoperative nephroscopy was used to remove calyceal stones. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 47 cases (95.9%) at discharge and 3-month CT. Two patients (4.08%) had residual fragments needing RIRS at 3 months. The mean operative time was 88.67 min (70– 120), and hospital stay averaged 5.87 days (5– 8). The follow-up period averaged 24.48 months (24– 30). Intraoperative complications occurred in 10.20%, and significant postoperative complications in seven cases (14.28%), including sepsis, urinary leakage, chest effusion, and wound issues.Conclusion: Single-session OSS with Nephroscopic clearance can achieve a higher stone-free rate. Although the morbidity of OSS is considerably higher than that of PNL, it may be safe and effective for managing complex stone burdens in resource-constrained rural areas of developing countries.Keywords: complex renal stones, open stone surgery, rural kidney stones, intraoperative nephroscopy, case series, calycotomy

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is “Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy” a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study — Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Renchamo Kikon · Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS