Factors affecting take up of community based antenatal programmes in high income countries:a rapid realist review

Abstract Problem Take up of antenatal programmes based in the community was lower than expected in a deprived UK case study area, despite targeted support. More understanding was required regarding why, to make effective changes. Background Different models of antenatal programme can be delivered in community settings, to help improve the health of children from deprived areas. Objective To identify theories associated with how, why and in what contexts parents-to-be access community based antenatal programmes in high income countries, to increase service use. Review Methods Rapid Realist Review, incorporating initial review of national policy documents, reports, observations of antenatal pathway meetings, development of review programme theories with Reference Group support. Results Forty eight papers met the Review criteria and were included: 11 systematic reviews, meta-syntheses; realist reviews, protocols; 34 single studies; two dissertations, one grey literature article. Evidence identified gaps in knowledge to optimise attendance and highlighted the importance of health practitioners but details on impact were lacking. Several factors appeared to impact on access to antenatal support, specifically marketing and inclusivity, perceived candidacy for care, needs prioritisation, practitioner promotion of programmes, stereotypes of fathers’ roles, site accessibility, timings, transport, negativity with venues. Discussion Mechanisms were not easily identified within the literature reviewed. Many papers and reports focussed on background and context. There was an absence of information on how programmes had been advertised, contact and referral processes. Conclusions This review found several factors that may encourage engagement with antenatal programmes. Further research is required to uncover mechanisms regarding access, or how practitioners can support these. Voices of those not engaging should be included, including those from White, Eastern European backgrounds and fathers/partners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors affecting take up of community based antenatal programmes in high income countries:a rapid realist review

Gill Thornton, Laura McLarty, Rebecca Hawkins, Rosemary McEachan et al.
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Factors affecting take up of community based antenatal programmes in high income countries:a rapid realist review

Gill Thornton, Laura McLarty, Rebecca Hawkins, Rosemary McEachan, Susanne Coleman, MARIA JOYCE Bryant
article en

Abstract

Abstract Problem Take up of antenatal programmes based in the community was lower than expected in a deprived UK case study area, despite targeted support. More understanding was required regarding why, to make effective changes. Background Different models of antenatal programme can be delivered in community settings, to help improve the health of children from deprived areas. Objective To identify theories associated with how, why and in what contexts parents-to-be access community based antenatal programmes in high income countries, to increase service use. Review Methods Rapid Realist Review, incorporating initial review of national policy documents, reports, observations of antenatal pathway meetings, development of review programme theories with Reference Group support. Results Forty eight papers met the Review criteria and were included: 11 systematic reviews, meta-syntheses; realist reviews, protocols; 34 single studies; two dissertations, one grey literature article. Evidence identified gaps in knowledge to optimise attendance and highlighted the importance of health practitioners but details on impact were lacking. Several factors appeared to impact on access to antenatal support, specifically marketing and inclusivity, perceived candidacy for care, needs prioritisation, practitioner promotion of programmes, stereotypes of fathers’ roles, site accessibility, timings, transport, negativity with venues. Discussion Mechanisms were not easily identified within the literature reviewed. Many papers and reports focussed on background and context. There was an absence of information on how programmes had been advertised, contact and referral processes. Conclusions This review found several factors that may encourage engagement with antenatal programmes. Further research is required to uncover mechanisms regarding access, or how practitioners can support these. Voices of those not engaging should be included, including those from White, Eastern European backgrounds and fathers/partners.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.