Realizing Crime Victims’ Participatory Rights on the Frontstage:An Analysis of the Dutch Courtroom

Since victims generally lack full legal party status in criminal proceedings, and judges and prosecutors exercise significant discretionary power, the realization of victims’ participatory rights depends on the behaviour of criminal justice professionals and is shaped by courtroom norms. Drawing on courtroom observations, this study shows that the enforcement of victims’ rights is an interactive process that hinges on real-time, in-person communication. By applying a Goffmanian framework, this study makes claims about the role responsibilities to which criminal justice professionals respond in facilitating these rights. The article concludes that while victims’ participatory rights are consistently realized due to interactive opportunities in the courtroom, the manner in which they are realized varies. This variation reflects the different role responsibilities judges assume, and demonstrates how discretion gives rise to divergent behavioural norms in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VU Research Portal
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realizing Crime Victims’ Participatory Rights on the Frontstage:An Analysis of the Dutch Courtroom

Alice Bosma, Freya Augusteijn, Catrien Bijleveld, Antony Pemberton
VU Research Portal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Realizing Crime Victims’ Participatory Rights on the Frontstage:An Analysis of the Dutch Courtroom

Alice Bosma, Freya Augusteijn, Catrien Bijleveld, Antony Pemberton
article en

Abstract

Since victims generally lack full legal party status in criminal proceedings, and judges and prosecutors exercise significant discretionary power, the realization of victims’ participatory rights depends on the behaviour of criminal justice professionals and is shaped by courtroom norms. Drawing on courtroom observations, this study shows that the enforcement of victims’ rights is an interactive process that hinges on real-time, in-person communication. By applying a Goffmanian framework, this study makes claims about the role responsibilities to which criminal justice professionals respond in facilitating these rights. The article concludes that while victims’ participatory rights are consistently realized due to interactive opportunities in the courtroom, the manner in which they are realized varies. This variation reflects the different role responsibilities judges assume, and demonstrates how discretion gives rise to divergent behavioural norms in practice.

VU Research Portal
The Family Centre (NZ), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), L'Alliance Boviteq (CA), KU Leuven (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Realizing Crime Victims’ Participatory Rights on the Frontstage:An Analysis of the Dutch Courtroom — Alice Bosma, Freya Augusteijn, et al. · VU Research Portal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS