Technological Triangle—Making Public Transport Sustainable and More Accessible

The technological triangle is a non-mathematical representation of the relationship between the characteristics of transport infrastructure, modes of transport, and the operational concept in a specific region. It is only through the synergistic effect of these three vertices that the railway undertaking, infrastructure manager, and authority can achieve optimal resource utilisation. Concurrently, it is imperative to exert pressure on the authorities to implement conceptual, systematic, and predictable measures. The process of implementing changes to transport infrastructure is a protracted one, typically spanning several years from the initial stages of preparation through to the project’s execution. The application of the technological triangle is possible on various parts of the infrastructure. Based on previous research, the authors prepared this Article to address intermediate stations, which were identified as the key focus of this article. Therefore, the authors in this article answer the question of what typical solutions exist for intermediate station configurations in relation to the operational concept and financial costs. Twenty different configurations were selected, and each was examined from the perspectives of financial, operational, planning, automation, and user pillars. The weights of the individual pillars were then assessed from the perspective of the infrastructure manager, the carrier, and the customer. The result is a comprehensive assessment of all wayside station configurations from different perspectives. Each user of this workflow can determine the weights of the individual pillars according to their needs and financial capabilities. This also gives the article a general use. The final part of the article presents specific examples of existing structures in the Czech Republic, which were not built with the perspective of this article in mind. The authors point out that if our method were applied, not only would large platform stations be built, which is the case for many intermediate stations in the Czech Republic; instead, more efficient solutions would be developed and adapted to the specific case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020670
Primary Topic
Transport and Logistics Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technological Triangle—Making Public Transport Sustainable and More Accessible

Jaromír ŠIROKÝ, Lukáš Křižan, Petr Nachtigall, Marek Vyhnanovský
Sustainability
Transport and Logistics Innovations
article

Technological Triangle—Making Public Transport Sustainable and More Accessible

Jaromír ŠIROKÝ, Lukáš Křižan, Petr Nachtigall, Marek Vyhnanovský
article en

Abstract

The technological triangle is a non-mathematical representation of the relationship between the characteristics of transport infrastructure, modes of transport, and the operational concept in a specific region. It is only through the synergistic effect of these three vertices that the railway undertaking, infrastructure manager, and authority can achieve optimal resource utilisation. Concurrently, it is imperative to exert pressure on the authorities to implement conceptual, systematic, and predictable measures. The process of implementing changes to transport infrastructure is a protracted one, typically spanning several years from the initial stages of preparation through to the project’s execution. The application of the technological triangle is possible on various parts of the infrastructure. Based on previous research, the authors prepared this Article to address intermediate stations, which were identified as the key focus of this article. Therefore, the authors in this article answer the question of what typical solutions exist for intermediate station configurations in relation to the operational concept and financial costs. Twenty different configurations were selected, and each was examined from the perspectives of financial, operational, planning, automation, and user pillars. The weights of the individual pillars were then assessed from the perspective of the infrastructure manager, the carrier, and the customer. The result is a comprehensive assessment of all wayside station configurations from different perspectives. Each user of this workflow can determine the weights of the individual pillars according to their needs and financial capabilities. This also gives the article a general use. The final part of the article presents specific examples of existing structures in the Czech Republic, which were not built with the perspective of this article in mind. The authors point out that if our method were applied, not only would large platform stations be built, which is the case for many intermediate stations in the Czech Republic; instead, more efficient solutions would be developed and adapted to the specific case.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
University of Pardubice (CZ), University of Žilina (SK)
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Transport and Logistics Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.